Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:53:50.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concepts for Dry Processing of Spent Nuclear Fuel for Recycling to Light-Water Reactors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Jerry Christian
Affiliation:
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, National SNF Program
James Sterbentz
Affiliation:
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, National SNF Program
David Abbott
Affiliation:
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, National SNF Program
K.R. Czerwinski
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept of Nuclear Engineering, Cambridge, MA
R. Cacciapouti
Affiliation:
Duke Engineering Services, Marlborough, MA
Get access

Abstract

We have initiated a study of improved methods for implementing dry (AIROX) processing of commercial spent nuclear fuels for recycling back into light-water reactors. In this proliferation-resistant recycle, the spent fuel is converted to a powder, blended with fresh medium-enriched uranium powder, and refabricated into fuel elements. Evaluations of neutronic characteristics show that it will be necessary to remove a substantial portion of the neutronabsorbing fission products in the spent fuel, especially lanthanides and rhodium, in order to achieve efficient utilization of the spent fuel. We have already modeled oxidative vaporization of selected fission products from the powder at 1000 °C. In addition to permanent gases and fission products that are vaporized during pellet sintering, this can remove Tc, Mo, and some Ru and improve the neutronics. A number of approaches are being evaluated for removing lanthanides and rhodium, initially by thermodynamic modeling and review of literature. The lanthanides exist in solid solution with UO2 so separations methods will require conversion to fine powder; rhodium is present as a metallic inclusion in the epsilon phase. Chlorination of finely powdered oxide at 1100-1200 °C would vaporize substantial portions of Nd, Eu, Gd, and Rh. A fraction of the uranium would also vaporize; if significant, it could be recovered for recycle. Magnetic and electrostatic methods were evaluated for separation of lanthanide from spent fuel. They are not likely to be practical. However, static separation techniques may be applicable for removing rhodium in the fine powder metallic inclusions. These technicalconsiderations provide the basis for a suggested experimental program.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Carleson, T.E., Chipman, N.A., Wai, C.M., “Separation Techniques in Nuclear Waste Management”, CRC Press, 1996.Google Scholar
2 Green, D.W. (editor), “Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook”, sixth edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1973.Google Scholar
3 Taylor, P. and McEachern, R.J., “Process to remove rare earths from spent nuclear fuel”, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, US Patent No. 5,597,538, January 28, 1997.Google Scholar
4 Kleykamp, H., “The Chemical State of the Fission Products in Oxide Fuels”, Journal of Nuclear Materials 131 (1985) 221246.Google Scholar
5 Olander, D.R., “Fundamental Aspects of Nuclear Reactor Fuel Elements”, TID-2671 l-Pl, prepared for the Division of Reactor Development and Demonstration, Energy Research and Development Administration, published by Technical Information Center, U.S. Department of Energy, 1976.Google Scholar
6 Weast, R.C., editor, “Handbook of Chemistry and Physics”, page F140, 51th edition, The Chemical Rubber Co., 18901 Cranwood Parkway, Cleveland, Ohio, 44128.Google Scholar
7 Dean, John A., editor, “Lange's Handbook of Chemistry”, pages 3-2 to 36, copyright 1979, McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
8 Lide, D.R., editor-in-chief, “CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics”, page 12119, 71 st edition 1990-1991, The Chemical Rubber Co., 18901 Cranwood Parkway Google Scholar
9 Edenius, M. and Forssen, B., CASMO-3 - A Fuel Assembly Burnup Program, Version 4.4 and Amendment for Version 4.7 (Rev. 2), Studsvik/NFA-89/3, Original Release in November 1989, Rev. 3 Release in June 1993.Google Scholar
10 Hermann, O. and Westfall, R., ORIGEN-S: SCALE System Module to Calculate Fuel Depletion, Actinide Transmutation, Fission Product Buildup and Decay, and Associated Radiation Source Terms, NUREG/CR-0200, Revision 5, Volume 2, Section F7, ORNL/NUREG/CSD-2/V2/R5, Draft User Documentation for Release of SCALE-4.3, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, September 1995.Google Scholar
11 Hoyt, R. C., Grantham, L. F., Clark, R. G., and Twitchell, P. W., AIROX Dry Reprocessing of Uranium Oxide Fuels, Report ESG-DOE-13276, July 12, 1979.Google Scholar
12 Lucuta, P. G., Verrall, R. A., Matzke, Hj., and Palmer, B. J., “Microstructural feature of SIMFUEL Simulated high-burnup U02-based nuclear fuel,” J. Nucl. Mater., 178, 4860 (1991).Google Scholar
13 Lucuta, P. G., Aceram, Ontario, Canada, personal communication, January 1999.Google Scholar