Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:55:22.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competitive Guidance Cues Affect Fibroblast Cell Alignment: Electric Fields vs. Contact Guidance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Iain R. Gibson  and
Colin D. McCaig
Iain R. Gibson
Affiliation:
School of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Institute of Medical Sciences, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Colin D. McCaig
Affiliation:
School of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Institute of Medical Sciences, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Get access

Abstract

When bovine ligament fibroblast cells were cultured on parallel micro-grooved surfaces, they aligned their long axes parallel to the groove direction. This alignment was dependent on the groove depth, with increasing groove depth increasing guided cell alignment. When cells were cultured in a physiological dc electric field (EF) on non-grooved, flat surfaces, the cells aligned in response to the EF, with their long axes perpendicular to the EF vector. This response was EF strength dependent, increasing EF strength (from 20 to 200mV/mm) increased cell alignment, perpendicular to the EF vector. These two guidance cues were applied simultaneously, so that the EF vector was parallel to the groove direction. At high but still physiological EF strengths (200mV/mm) cells ignored the topography and were guided by the EF alone, aligning perpendicular to the EF vector, as on non-grooved surfaces. At low field strengths (20mV/mm) cells responded only to the topographic guidance cue, with cells aligning parallel to the grooves and therefore also to the EF vector. Intermediate field strengths (50 to 100mV/mm) produced a mixed response, with cells responding to both guidance cues. The effect of removing serum from the culture medium on the EF and topographical guidance of fibroblast cells was studied and the results were compared to cells on non-grooved surfaces. Removal of serum produced a small but significant decrease in the angle of cell alignment for cells on non-grooved surfaces, from 78 to 63 degrees, relative to the EF vector, but did not completely suppress the EF guidance cue. In contrast, the EF guidance of cells on grooved substrates was suppressed almost completely by the absence of serum, with cells responding only to the grooved topography, aligning their long axis parallel to the grooves and the EF vector. These results imply that alignment of fibroblasts by topography is serum-independent, but alignment by EFs is serum-dependent. In addition they demonstrate that the alignment of fibroblast cells can be tailored by the dual guidance cues of topography and electric fields.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 845: Symposium AA – Nanoscale Materials Science in Biology and Medicine , 2004 , AA1.8
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brunette, D. M., Exp. Cell. Res. 164, 11–26 (1986)Google Scholar
2. Curtis, A. and Wilkinson, C., Biomaterials 18, 1573–1583 (1997)Google Scholar
3. den Braber, E. T., De Ruijter, J. E., Ginsel, L. A., von Recum, A. F. and Jansen, J. A., Biomaterials 17, 2037–2044 (1996)Google Scholar
4. Clark, P., Connolly, P., Curtis, A.S., Dow, J.A. and Wilkinson, C. D., Development 108, 635–644 (1990)Google Scholar
5. McCaig, C. D., Rajnicek, A. M., Song, B. and Zhao, M., Trends Neurosci. 25, 354‐359 (2002)Google Scholar
6. Nuccitelli, R. and Erickson, C. A., Exp. Cell. Res. 147, 195‐201 (1983)Google Scholar
7. Yang, W-P., Onuma, E.K. and Hui, S-W., Exp. Cell. Res. 155, 92–104 (1984)Google Scholar
8. Finkelstein, E., Chang, W., Chao, P.-H. G., Gruber, D., Minden, A., Hung, C. T. and Bulinski, J. C., J. Cell Sci. 117, 1533–1545 (2004)Google Scholar
9. Silman, A. L., Quang, D. M., Farboud, B., Fang, K. S., Nuccitelli, R. and Isseroff, R. R., Exp. Dermatol. 12, 396–402 (2003)Google Scholar
10. Rajnicek, A. M., Britland, S. and McCaig, C. D., J. Cell Sci. 110, 2905–2913 (1997)Google Scholar