Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T17:27:04.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Er3+ Photoluminescence and Photoluminescence Excitation Spectroscopy in In-situ-doped GaN:Er and Er-implanted GaN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Andrea M. Mitofsky
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of IIlings, Urbana IL 61801
George C. Papen
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of IIlings, Urbana IL 61801
Stephen G. Bishop
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of IIlings, Urbana IL 61801
Dong-Seon Lee
Affiliation:
Nanoelectrical Laboratory, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0030
Andrew J. Steckl
Affiliation:
Nanoelectrical Laboratory, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0030
Get access

Abstract

Site-selective photolumiescence (PL) and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectroscopies have been carried out at 6 K on the ∼1540nm 41/32 → 4I1/52 Er3+ transition in in-situ-doped GaN:Er which have detected nine differenct Er3+ sites and associated PL spectra. Three distinct Er3+ sites are identified in the in-situ-doped samples. For the in-situ-doped samples, the concentration of the various Er+3 sites are comparable while for the ion-implanted sample, the concertration of one Er3+ site was higher than the concentration of the other sites. In-situ-doped samples grown with different Ex-cell temperatures were considered, and the width of the PLE spectrum appears to be a function of the Er-cell temperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Steckl, A.J., Heikenfeld, J., Garter, M., Birkhahn, B., and Lee, D., Compound Semiconductor, 6, (2000).Google Scholar
2. Favennec, P.N., Haridon, H.L., Salvi, M., Moutonnet, D., and Guillou, Y.Le., Electronics Letters, 25, (1999).Google Scholar
3. Favennec, A.J., and Wessels, B.W., Applied Physics Letters, 25, (1992).Google Scholar
4. Kim, S., Rhee, S.J., Turnbull, D.A., Reuter, E.E., Li, X., Coleman, J.J., and Bishop, S.G., Applied Physics Letters, 71, (1997).Google Scholar
5. Kim, S., Rhee, S.J., Turnbull, D.A., Coleman, J.J., Bishop, S.G., and Klein, P.B., Applied Physics Letters, 71, (1997).Google Scholar
6. Kim, S., Rhee, S.J., Li, X., Coleman, J.J., Bishop, S.G., and Klein, P.B., Journal of Electronic Materials, 27, 4, (1998).Google Scholar
7. Kim, S., Rhee, S.J., Li, X., Coleman, J.J., Bishop, S.G., Journal of Electronic Materials, 28, 3, (1999).Google Scholar