Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T02:18:35.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparative Study of Thin-Film and Bulk Reaction Kinetics and Diffusion Path: the Ir/GaAs System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Kevin J. Schulz
Affiliation:
IBM - General Technology Division, Essex Junction, VT 05452
Y. Austin Chang
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 1509 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706
Get access

Abstract

Control of the structure and chemistry at the interfaces of compound semiconductors is essential for the commercial use of these materials in electronic and optical technologies. This can only be achieved when the governing thermodynamics and kinetics of interfacial reactions are understood. Based primarily on the experience of metal/Si interactions, however, a prevailing belief was born that thin-film reactions follow a separate set of thermodynamic and kinetic “rules” which are different from bulk reactions. The intent of our work has been to not only characterize metal/GaAs contact reactions but also to rationalize these reactions with equilibrium phase diagrams and bulk metal/GaAs diffusion couple experiments. Through this approach, a better understanding of thin-film and bulk differences has been obtained.

The Ir/GaAs system is used as an example. Phase formation and reaction kinetics were studied for 30 nm Ir films on (100) GaAs using TEM, XTEM, and AEM. Bulk diffusion between 0.25 mm thick Ir foil and (100) GaAs wafers was studied with SEM and electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The diffusion paths and kinetics were the same for thin-film and bulk. The phase sequence Ir/IrGa/IrAs2/GaAs formed for all diffusion couples. Reaction kinetics were parabolic with an activation energy of 3.0 eV for both thin-film and bulk, and the data was colinear in an Arrhenius plot. Reacted layer morphology in both cases was layered. The effects of grain size, crystallographic texturing, and the relative diffusivities of the components on the reaction mechanisms in bulk versus thin-film reactions are considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Shiau, F.-Y., Zuo, Y., Zheng, X.-Y., Lin, J.-C., and Chang, Y.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 119 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Schulz, K.J., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1988.Google Scholar
3. Schulz, K.J., Musbah, O.A., and Chang, Y.A., in press.Google Scholar
4. Schulz, K.J., Lin, J.C., Zheng, X.-Y., and Chang, Y.A., in press submitted to Acta Met.Google Scholar
5. Lin, J.-C., Hsieh, K.-C., Schulz, K.J., and Chang, Y.A., J. Mater. Res. 3, 148 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Lin, J.C., Zheng, X.-Y., Hsieh, K.C., and Chang, Y.A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 102 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Musbah, O.A., Schulz, K.J., and Chang, Y.A., in press.Google Scholar
8. Yu, K.-M., Sands, T., Jaklevic, J.M., and Haller, E.E., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1815 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Sands, T., Keramidas, V.G., Yu, K.M., Washburn, J., and Krishnan, K., J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2070 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Yu, K.-M., Ph.D. Thesis, University of California-Berkeley, 1987.Google Scholar