Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:00:39.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Experimental Evaluation of Modulated Photocurrent Spectroscopy as A Density of States Probe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S. Reynolds
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee DDI IHG, UK, [email protected]
C. Main
Affiliation:
School of Science and Engineering, University of Abertay Dundee, Dundee DDI IHG, UK, [email protected]
D.P. Webb
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
M.J. Rose
Affiliation:
Department of APEME, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Modulated and Fourier-transformed transient photocurrent (MPC and TPC-FT) spectroscopies have been evaluated through a study of the density and capture properties of localised states in as-prepared and light-soaked PECVD a-Si:H samples over a range of temperatures and optical excitations. Both techniques return a conduction band tail state characteristic energy of approximately 22 meV. However, defect state spectra differ in detail and are strongly influenced by dc optical excitation. A feature correlating with the quasi-Fermi level position is observed, but the capture coefficient implied (of order 10-6 cm3 s-1) is some two orders greater than that calculated from thermal activation of emission frequencies. Such a value would suggest an implausibly low absolute density of defects. Possible explanations are briefly discussed and additional investigations proposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brüggemann, R., Main, C., Berkin, J. and Reynolds, S., Phil. Mag. B 62, 29 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Hattori, K., Niwano, Y., Okamoto, H., and Hamakawa, Y., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 137–138, 363 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Main, C., Brüggemann, R., Webb, D.P. and Reynolds, S., Sol. St. Commun. 83, 401 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Main, C., Webb, D.P. and Reynolds, S., in Electronic, Optoelectronic and Magnetic Thin Films, edited by Marshall, J.M., Kirov, N. and Vavrek, A., (John Wiley-Research Studies Press, New York 1995), pp. 1225.Google Scholar
5. Main, C. in Amorphous andMicrocrystalline Silicon Technology, edited by Hack, M., Schiff, E.A., Wagner, S., Matsuda, A. and Schropp, R. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 467, Pittsburgh, PA 1997), pp. 167178.Google Scholar
6. Hattori, K., Okamoto, H., and Hamakawa, Y., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 198–200, 288 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Webb, D.P., PhD thesis, University of Abertay Dundee, UK, 1994.Google Scholar
8. Webb, D.P., Main, C., Reynolds, S., Brüggemann, R., Chan, Y.C. and Lam, Y.W., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 227–230, 211 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Cohen, J.D. and Kwon, D., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 227–230, 348 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Reynolds, S., Main, C., Webb, D.P. and Rose, M.J., 10th International School on Condensed Matter Physics (Varna, Bulgaria, 1-4 Sept. 1998), in press.Google Scholar
11. Arkhipov, V.I. and Adriaenssens, G.J., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 227–230, 166 (1998).Google Scholar