Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:50:54.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Computational Thermodynamics in Rapid Prototyping and Infiltrating Steel Parts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Brian D. Kernan ,
Emanuel M. Sachs  and
Samuel Allen
Brian D. Kernan
Affiliation:
Christoph Sachs Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
Emanuel M. Sachs
Affiliation:
Christoph Sachs Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
Samuel Allen
Affiliation:
Christoph Sachs Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
Get access

Abstract

The direct manufacture of metal parts by rapid prototyping often involves building a porous skeleton from a metal powder. In this work, a method termed Homogeneous Steel Infiltration has been developed for infiltrating steel skeletons to make conventional tool steel alloys. The method uses a gated infiltration route that uses as the infiltrant a steel alloy with a lower melting point than the base powder. The infiltrant liquid may use carbon and/or silicon as a melting point depressant. Premature freeze-off of the steel infiltrant is avoided by operating at a temperature where some liquid is stable at chemical equilibrium. The compositions of the skeleton and infiltrant and the infiltration temperature are selected by using computational thermodynamics. Examples of successful infiltrations using D2 and A3 tool steels as target compositions are shown. The thermodynamic design method enables suitable parameters to make other tool steels, some stainless steels and manganese steels.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 860: Symposium LL – Materials Issues in Solid Freeforming , 2004 , LL4.2
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sachs, E., Wylonis, E., Cima, M., Allen, S., Michaels, S., Sun, E., Tang, H. and Guo, H.: ANTEC ‘95. Vol. I--Processing. Society of Plastic Engineers. 1995, pp. 997–1003.Google Scholar
2 Paul, B.K., and Baskaran, S.: J. Mat.Proc.Tech., 1996, vol. 61, pp. 168–172.Google Scholar
3 Radstok, E.: Rap. Prototyping. J., 1999, vol. 5, pp. 164–168.Google Scholar
4 Dimov, S.S., Pham, D.T., Lacan, F. and Dotchev, K.D.: Assembly Automation, 2001 vol. 21, pp. 296–302.Google Scholar
5 Sachs, E., Williams, P., Brancazio, D., Cima, M. and Kremmin, K.: Proceedings of Manufacturing International ‘90, New York, American Society of Manufacturing Engineers, 1990 vol. 4, pp. 131–6.Google Scholar
6 Michaels, S., Sachs, E. and Cima, M.: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 1992; Austin, University of Texas, pp. 244–250. (1992).Google Scholar
7 Lembo, J.: Adv. Mater. & Processes. 2003, vol. 161, pp. 52–3.Google Scholar
8 German, R.M., “Powder Metallurgy Science”. MPIF1. Princeton, NJ, 1994, p 310.Google Scholar
9 Lowhaphandu, P., Lewandowski, J.J.: Metall. Mater. Trans A, 1999 Vol 30A pp325–334.Google Scholar
10 Stewart, T.D, Dalgarno, K.W., Childs, T.H.C., Perkins, J, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium 1999; Austin, University of Texas, pp. 443–49. (1999).Google Scholar
11 Uzunsoy, D., Chang, I.T.H. and Bowen, P., P: Powder Metall., 2002 vol 45, pp. 251–-4.Google Scholar
12 Lorenz, A., Sachs, E., Allen, S., Rafflenbeul, L., and Kernan, B.: Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2004 Vol. 35A, pp. 631–640.Google Scholar
13 Lorenz, A., Sachs, E., and Allen, S.: Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2004 vol. 35A, pp. 641–653.Google Scholar