Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:34:47.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding of Relationship Between the Average Mass Transport Rate And The Moments Of Permeability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Y. Niibori
Affiliation:
Department of Quantum Science and Energy Engr.,Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579 Japan
O. Tochiyama
Affiliation:
Department of Quantum Science and Energy Engr.,Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579 Japan
T. Chida
Affiliation:
Department of Geoscience and Technology Engr.,Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579 Japan
Get access

Abstract

To estimate the transport rate of radionuclides in the geosphere, we must consider the spatial variability of permeability. However, the borehole data of permeability are limited and we can not determine the type of probability density function, though the measurement data reflect the most significant hydraulic properties about geologic media including innumerable cracks or fast flow paths. While the recent models describing radioactive nuclide transport in near/far-field have assumed a certain probability density function (typically a lognormal distribution) as a permeability distribution, we cannot always obtain sufficient measurement data to define the function. However, the available data of permeability at least give us the moments such as the arithmetic mean, the standard deviation and the skewness for the distribution.

The purpose of this paper is to get an understanding of the general relationship between the average mass transport rates and the moments. Using various types of probability density functions and pseudo random-numbers, hypothetical permeability distributions are generated. With these distributions, this paper obtains the average transport rates described as the numerical impulseresponse based on the advection-dispersion model for a two-dimensional region. The calculated results show that, for the dimensionless standard deviation up to around 1, the three moments are enough to characterize the permeability distribution for the purposes of the nuclide transport prediction.

In this work, for five specified probability density functions, the upper and lower bounds of skewness are derived as a function of the dimensionless arithmetic mean and standard deviation. The obtained upper and lower bounds explicitly show that the Bernoulli trials (a discrete probability density function) yield the widest range in the skewness against the standard deviation. Since the response has lower peak and longer tail as the skewness goes to the lower bound value, we can predict the shape of the breakthrough curve from the three moments of the borehole data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Chapman, N.A. and McKinley, I.G., The Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste, (JOHN WILEY & SONS, Chichester, 1987, pp.108132.Google Scholar
2. Grindrod, P., McEwen, T., Robinson, P. and Savege, D., Chapter 5 The far-field, in The Scientific and Regulatory Basis for the Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste, edited by Savege, D., JOHN WILEY & SONS, Chichester, 1995, pp. 119183.Google Scholar
3. Clark, K.J., Ikeda, T., Impey, M.D., McEwen, T. and White, M.: An Analysis of Bias in Groundwater Modelling due to the Interpretation of Site Characterization Data, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, edited by Gray, W.J. and Triay, I.R. ( Mater.Res. Soc. Proc., 465, Pittsburgh, PA 1997), pp. 11251132.Google Scholar
4. Wen, X.H. and Gómez-Hernádez, J.J.: Numerical modeling of macrodispersion in heterogeneous media: a compariosn of multi-Gaussian and non-multi-Gaussian models, J. Contaminant Hydrology, 30, 129156 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Niibori, Y., Tochiyama, O. and Chida, T.: Estimation of the radionuclide Transport by Applying the mean, the standard deviation and the skewness of permeability, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, edited by Gray, W.J. and Triay, I.R. (Mater.Res. Soc. Proc., 465, Pittsburgh, PA 1997), pp.917924.Google Scholar
6. Tsang, Y.W., Tsang, C.F., Neretnieks, I. and Moreno, L.: Flow and Tracer Transport in Fractured Media: A Variable Aperture Channel Model and Its Properties, Water Resour. Res., 24, 20492060 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Moreno, L., Tsang, Y.W., Tsang, C.F., Hale, F.V. and Neretnieks, I.: Flow and Tracer Transport in a Single Fracture: A Stochastic Model and Its Relation to Some Field Observations, Water Resour. Res., 24, 20332048 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Smith, L. and Schwartz, F.W.: Mass Transport, 1. A Stochastic Analysis of Macroscopic Dispersion, Water Resour. Res., 16, 303313 (1980).Google Scholar
9. Tang, C.F., Tsang, Y.W. and Hale, F.: Tracer Transport in Fractures: Analysis of Field Data Based on a Variable-Aperture Channel Model, Water Resour. Res., 27, 30953106 (1991)Google Scholar
10. Moreno, L.,Tsang, C.F.,Tsang, Y. and Neretnieks, I.: Some anomalous features of flow and solute transport arising from fracture aperture variability, Water Resour. Res., 26, 23772391 (1990)Google Scholar
11. Niibori, Y. and Chida, T.: The Use of Standard Deviation and Skewness for Estimating Apparent Permeability in Two-Dimensional, Heterogeneous Medium, Transport in Porous Media, 15, 114 (1994)Google Scholar
12. Niibori, Y., Ogura, H. and Chida, T.: Identification of Geothermal Reservoir Structure Analyzing Tracer Responses Using The Two-Fractured-Layer Model, Geothermics, 24, 4960 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Levenspoel, O., Chemical Reaction Engineering, 2nd Edn., JOHN WILEY & SONS, New York, 1972, pp.282283.Google Scholar
14. Niibori, Y., Xie, H.C. and Chida, T.: Tracer response in a vertical, two-dimensional, porous medium accompanied by heat transfer – Comparison of the laboratory experiments with the numerical model, J. Groundwater Hydrology, 36, 123132 (1994) (Japanese with English abstracts).Google Scholar