Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:20:50.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding MOCVD Gas Chemistry to Reduce the Cost of Ownership for GaN LED and AsP CPV Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2012

E.A. Armour*
Affiliation:
Veeco Instruments, Turbodisc Operations, 394 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873 U.S.A.
B. Mitrovic
Affiliation:
Veeco Instruments, Turbodisc Operations, 394 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873 U.S.A.
A. Zhang
Affiliation:
Veeco Instruments, Turbodisc Operations, 394 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873 U.S.A.
C. Ebert
Affiliation:
Veeco Instruments, Turbodisc Operations, 394 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873 U.S.A.
M. Pophristic
Affiliation:
Veeco Instruments, Turbodisc Operations, 394 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873 U.S.A.
A. Paranjpe
Affiliation:
Veeco Instruments, Turbodisc Operations, 394 Elizabeth Avenue, Somerset, NJ 08873 U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

As compound semiconductors continue to make inroads into common electronic devices, it is critically important to lower the cost of the primary metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) epitaxial process, which creates the foundation for the devices. Both GaN-based light-emitting diode (LED) and AsP-based concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) markets have been focused on simultaneous cost-reduction, cycle time reductions, and device efficiency improvements, which can be realized utilizing higher growth rates and operating pressures. To achieve these goals, it has become increasingly important to understand the underlying growth mechanisms that drive the chemistry within the MOCVD process.

Higher growth rates and higher operating pressures both result in parasitic gas-phase particle formation, which degrades the physical, electrical and optical properties of the deposited layers. In extreme cases, it can reduce the deposition efficiency to the point where increasing the reactant constituents results in reduced growth rates. In this paper, we will examine the tradeoffs that need to be made to achieve good crystal quality with abrupt interfaces, smooth surface morphology, and good minority carrier properties for films deposited at high growth rates and high pressure. While exceptional device performance has been achieved for both GaN-based LEDs and AsP-based CPV cells, it is primarily cost that is limiting full-scale adoption of compound semiconductors into these potentially enormous markets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Solid-State Lighting Research and Development: Manufacturing Roadmap, July 2010, from the U.S. Department of Energy http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/ssl/ssl_manuf-roadmap_july2010.pdf Google Scholar
2. Ohtsuka, M. and Suzuki, A., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 7358 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Armour, E. A., Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico, (1994).Google Scholar
4. Schlyer, D.J. and Ring, M.A., J. Organometallic Chem 114, 9 (1976).Google Scholar
5. Leys, M.R. and Veenvliet, H., J. Crystal Growth 55, 145 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Creighton, J.R., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 9, 2895 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Creighton, J.R., Bansenauer, B.A., Huett, T., and White, J.M., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A11, 876 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Donnelly, V.M. and McCaulley, J.A., Surf. Science 238, 34 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Mitrovic, B., Armour, E. A., Zhang, A., Gurary, A., and Paranjpe, A., poster presented at 9th International Conference on Nitride Semiconductors (ICNS), Glasgow, Scotland, (2011).Google Scholar
10. Mihopoulos, T.G., Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (1998).Google Scholar
11. Parikh, R.P. and Adomaitis, R.A., J. Crystal Growth 286, 259 (2006).Google Scholar
12. Cavallotti, C., Moscatelli, D., Masi, M. and Carrà, S., J. Crystal Growth 266, 363 (2004).Google Scholar
13. Hirako, A., Kusakabe, K., Ohkawa, K., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 44, 874 (2005).Google Scholar
14. Creighton, J. R., Wang, G.T., Breiland, W.G., and Coltrin, M.E., J. Crystal Growth 261, 204 (2004).Google Scholar
15. Thon, A. and Kuech, T.F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 55 (1996).Google Scholar
16. Almond, M.J., Jenkins, C.E., Rice, D.A., and Hagen, K., J. Organometallic Chem. 439,251 (1992).Google Scholar
17. Creighton, J.R., Breiland, W.G., Coltrin, M.E., and Pawlowski, R.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2626 (2002).Google Scholar
18. Lyons, J.L., Janotti, A., and Van de Walle, C.G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 152108 (2010).Google Scholar
19. Ting, S.M., Ramer, J.C., Florescu, D. I., Merai, V.N., Albert, B.E., Parekh, A., Lee, D.S., Lu, D., Christini, D.V., Liu, L., and Armour, E.A., J. Appl. Phys. 94, 1461 (2003).Google Scholar
20. Randall Creighton, J., Coltrin, Michael E., and Figiel, Jeffrey J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 171906 (2008).Google Scholar