Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:19:34.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Stability Of SiGe/Si Quantum Well Structures Grown By APCVD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Q. X. Zhao
Affiliation:
Physical Electronics and Photonics, Department of Microelectronics and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden, [email protected]
O. Nur
Affiliation:
Physical Electronics and Photonics, Department of Microelectronics and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden, [email protected]
U. Södervall
Affiliation:
Physical Electronics and Photonics, Department of Microelectronics and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden, [email protected]
C. J. Patel
Affiliation:
Physical Electronics and Photonics, Department of Microelectronics and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden, [email protected]
M. Willandera
Affiliation:
Physical Electronics and Photonics, Department of Microelectronics and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University, S-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden, [email protected]
P.O. Holtz
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Linköping University of Technology, S-583 81 Linköping, Sweden
W.B. de Boer
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories, Prof. Holstlaan 4, 5656 AA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Single and double Si1-xGexx/Si quantum well (QW) structures, which were grown by atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD), are characterized by photoluminescence and secondary ion mass spectrometry. Systematic post-growth annealing treatments were carried out at temperatures between 600°C and 1100°C in pure N2 ambient. The interdiffusion between the Si layer and the Si1-xGex, well layers occurs at the annealing temperature around 900°C. The diffusion coefficient is deduced at different temperatures from SIMS measurements for single QW structures. The activation energy is about 3.9 eV in the temperature range between 950°C and 1100°C. The double QW structures show a similar value, but the accurate value is more difficult to obtain because it is more complicated to analyze the SIMS profile of the double QW structures. The intensity of the exciton recombination related to carriers confined in the double QW structures decreases with increasing annealing temperatures and becomes strongly suppressed at 750°C. When the annealing temperature is increased further, the intensity of the QW emission recovers. The results indicate that nonradiative centers were generated at annealing temperature of about 750°C

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Garone, P.M., Venkataraman, V., and Sturm, J.C., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 12, 230 (1991).Google Scholar
2 Iyer, S.S., Solomon, P.M., Kesan, V. O., Bright, A. A., Freeouf, J. L., Nguyen, T.N., and Warren, A. C., IEEE, Electron Device Lett. 12, 246 (1991).Google Scholar
3 Verdonckt-Vandebroek, S., Crabbe, E. F., Meyerson, B. S., Harame, D.L., Restle, P. J., Stork, J. M. C., and Johnson, J. B., IEEE Trans. Electron Device 41, 90 81994).Google Scholar
4 Boucaud, P., Wu, L., Guedi, C., Julien, F. H., Sajnes, I., Campidelli, Y., and Garchery, L., J. Appl. Phys. 80, 1414 (1996).Google Scholar
5 Latuske, H. M., Mantz, U., Yhonke, K., Sauer, R., Schaffler, F., and Herzog, H.J., 22nd International conference on the Physics of semiconductors, Vol.2, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995)p.1233 Google Scholar
6 Radamson, H. H., Ni, W. X., and Hansson, G. V., Appl. Surf. Science Vol.102, 82 (1996).Google Scholar
7 Lafontaine, H., Houghton, D. C., Rowell, N. L., and Aers, G. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1444 (1996).Google Scholar
8 Zeindl, H.P., Nilsson, S., and Bugiel, E., Appl. Surf. Science Vol.92, 552 (1996).Google Scholar
9 Usami, N., Shiraki, Y., and Fukatsu, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2340 (1996).Google Scholar
10 Sunamura, H., Fukatsu, S., Usami, N., and Shiraki, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 1651 (1993).Google Scholar
11 Hettich, G. and Mehrer, H., Materials Science Series: Diffusion in Crystalline Solids, ed. By Murch, Graeme E. and Nowick, Arthur S., (Academic Press,1984), p81.Google Scholar
12 Houghton, D. C., Aers, G. C., Yang, S. R. Eric, Wang, E., and Rowell, N.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 866 (1995).Google Scholar
13 Mera, Y., Maeda, K., and Shiraki, Y., Materials Science forum Vol.196–201, 365 (1995).Google Scholar