Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:29:24.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Technique For Measuring Slurry‐Flow Dynamics During Chemical ‐ Mechanical Polishing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. Coppeta
Affiliation:
Doctoral candidate, Tufts University Department of Mechanical Engineering
C. Rogers
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Tufts University Department of Mechanical Engineering
A. Philipossian
Affiliation:
Technology Manager, Intel Corporation
F. Kaufman
Affiliation:
CMP Engineering Fellow, Cabot Corporation
Get access

Abstract

Chemical‐Mechanical Polishing (CMP) is one of the fastest growing market segments in the semiconductor equipment industry. One of the critical consumable in CMP is a specialized solution, or slurry, which contains both free abrasives and chemicals acting together to planarize a wafer. These chemically active slurries account for approximately one fifth of the total cost of polishing a wafer. Because of the cost and potential toxicity, there are both financial and environmental pressures to reduce the amount of slurry consumed during the CMP process. To accomplish this in a systematic manner we have developed a technique for quantifying slurry flow patterns during CMP which involves using fluorescent dyes to measure slurry mixing, temperature gradients and slurry aging during the polishing. An aqueous fluorescent solution with matching viscosity is used to model the slurry, a glass window models the wafer and a commercially available polisher provides the polishing pad/table rotating work surface. This talk will focus on the diagnostic technique used to measure the slurry behavior as well as some semi‐quantitative results on both the amount and uniformity of slurry entrained beneath the wafer as a function of pad topography, injection location and pad rotation rates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nanz, G., Camilletti, L.E., IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 8, No. 4, pp. 382389 (1995).Google Scholar
2 Forester, L. et al., Proceedings of the 1995 VMIC Conference, Santa Clara, Californ. June 27–29, 1995. pp. 482484.Google Scholar
3 Shultz, L.D., U.S. Patent No. 5,081,796. (21 January 1992).Google Scholar
4 Fukuroda, A., etal., International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 468472.Google Scholar
5 Coppeta, J., Rogers, C., AIAA Paper Number 96–0539 (1996).Google Scholar