Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:38:27.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of interface formation of (Ba,Sr)TiO3 thin films grown by rf sputter deposition on bare Si and thermal SiO2/Si substrates.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

N. A. Suvorova
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, U.S.A.
A. H. Mueller
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, U.S.A.
A. A. Suvorova
Affiliation:
Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, WA, Australia
M. Saunders
Affiliation:
Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, WA, Australia
E. A. Irene
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

(Ba,Sr)TiO3 (BST) thin films were deposited by ion beam sputtering on both bare and oxidized Si. Spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE) model results have shown an increase in the SiO2 layer thickness for bare substrates and those with a 1 nm initial oxide layer, and a decrease for thicker (3.5 nm) initial SiO2 films. This result was confirmed by high resolution electron microscopy (HREM) analysis of the films, and it is believed to be due to simultaneous subcutaneous oxidation of Si and reaction of the BST layer with SiO2. From high-frequency capacitance-voltage (C-V) analysis, a decrease in the interface trap density Dit of an order of magnitude was observed for oxidized Si substrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wilk, G.D., Wallace, R.M. and Anthony, J.M., J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5243 (2001)Google Scholar
2. Mueller, A.H., Suvorova, N.A., Irene, E.A., Auciello, O. and Schultz, J.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3796 (2002)Google Scholar
3. Mueller, A.H., Suvorova, N.A., Irene, E.A., Auciello, O. and Schultz, J.A., J. Appl. Phys. (to be published)Google Scholar
4. Doolittle, L.R., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B9, 344 (1985)Google Scholar
5. Wang, Y. and Irene, E.A., J. Vac. Technol. B 18(1), 279 (1999)Google Scholar
6. Terman, L.M., Solid State Electron. 5, 285 (1962)Google Scholar
7. Baumann, F.H., Chang, C.-P., Grazul, J.L., Kamgar, A., Liu, C.T., and Muller, D.A. in Gate Stack and Silicide Issues in Silicon Processing, edited by: Clevenger, L., Campbell, S. A., Herner, B., Kittl, J., and Besser, P. R. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 611, 2000)Google Scholar
8. Borgardt, N.I., Plikat, B., Seibt, M. and Schroter, W., Ultramicroscopy, 90, 241 (2002)Google Scholar
9. Irene, E.A., Solid State Electron. 45, 12071217 (2001)Google Scholar
10. Krivanek, O.L., Kundmann, M.K. and Kimoto, K., J. of Microscopy, 180, 277 (1995)Google Scholar