Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T21:56:40.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure/Majority Carrier Relationships in Ion-Implanted Polymer Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

G. E. Wnek ,
B. Wasserman  and
I.-H. Loh
G. E. Wnek
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
B. Wasserman
Affiliation:
Department of PhysicsMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
I.-H. Loh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Get access

Abstract

Ion implantation of selected polymer films leads to the formation of semiconductive (σ ~ 10−4 S/cm) derivatives, which are presumably partially carbonacėous products derived from gross structural rearrangements. In support of this contention we find that Br-implanted polyacrylonitrile, PAN, exhibits a narrow ESR signal with a g-value of 2.0033, consistent with the presence of free radicals delocalized within a П-electron system. Thermopower measurements reveal that the sign of the majority carrier is dependent upon the molecular structure of the parent polymer.For example, implantation of PAN with Br+ affords n-type derivatives while under similar conditions poly(p-phenylene sulfide), PPS, and poly(2,6-dimethylphenylene-oxide), PPO, yield p-type semiconductors. It is suggested that the majority carriers arethe ions (carbenium ions or carbanions) which are best stabilized by the parent polymerstructure, remnants of which presumably exist after implantation. Resonance and/or inductive effects are invoked to explain the data. For example, the rather electron-rich backbone of PPQ is expected to stabilize holes more effectively than electrons, and the observed p-type behavior is consistent with this prediction.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 27: Symposium E – Ion Implantation and Ion Beam Processing of Materials , 1983 , 435
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Forrest, S. R., Kaplan, M. L., Schmidt, P. H., Venkatesan, T. and Lovinger, A. J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 41, 708 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Weber., D. C. Brant, P., Carosella, C. A. and Banks, L. G., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Comm., 522 (1981).Google Scholar
3. Mazurek, H., Day, D. R., Maby, E. W., Abel, J. S., Senturia, S. D., Dresselhaus, G., J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed., 21, 539 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Dresselhaus, M. S., Wasserman, B. and Wnek, G. E., Proceedings of this Conference.Google Scholar
5. Wertz, J. E. and Bolton, J. R., “Electron Spin Resonance. Elementary Theory and Practical Applications”, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 502 (1972).Google Scholar
6. Retcofsky, H. L., in “Coal Science. Vol. 1”, Gorbaty, M. L., Larsen, J. W. and Wender, I., eds., Academic Press, New York, p. 56 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Baughman, R. H., Bredas, J. L., Chance, R. R., Elsenbaumer, R. L. and Shackletter, L. W., Chem. Revs., 82 (2), 209 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Meier, H., “Organic Semiconductors”, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Ch.7 (1974).Google Scholar