Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T04:28:07.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure Development in Polyimide Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

John C. Coburn ,
Michael T. Pottiger  and
Coralie A. Pryde
John C. Coburn
Affiliation:
Dupont Electronics, Experimental Station, P.O. Box 80336 Wilmington, DE 19880-0336
Michael T. Pottiger
Affiliation:
Dupont Electronics, Experimental Station, P.O. Box 80336 Wilmington, DE 19880-0336
Coralie A. Pryde
Affiliation:
Dupont Electronics, Experimental Station, P.O. Box 80336 Wilmington, DE 19880-0336
Get access

Abstract

The influence of processing conditions on the structure and properties in spin coated polyimide films prepared from flexible, semi-rigid and rigid chemistries was investigated. While the relationship between processing, structure and properties is different for each chemistry, some general trends were observed. Curing above the glass transition in the flexible polyimide BTDA//ODA/MPD, that is incapable of crystallizing and has very little in-plane orientation, has virtually no effect on the structure or properties compared to curing below the glass transition. Curing at temperatures above the glass transition in cry stall izable stiff polyimides such as BPDA//PPD and PMDA//ODA results in an increase in birefringence, in-plane CTE and biaxial stress. In BPDA//PPD, the increase in birefringence is attributed to an increase in polarizability and possibly, an increase in the overall in-plane alignment of the imide ring as evidenced by IR analysis. The increase in in-plane CTE is attributed to a loss in chain axis orientation caused by relaxation effects. The increase in stress is attributed to the increase in the in-plane CTE and also from shrinkage forces arising from crystallization. Rapid heating during cure in the flexible amorphous BTDA//ODA/MPD has essentially no effect on structure or properties compared to slow heating. In the semi-crystalline polyimides, rapid heating during cure leads to higher levels of crystallinity and significantly higher stresses. The increase in stresses is attributed to a loss in chain axis orientation in the plane of the film and shrinkage forces arising from additional crystallization. The directional dependence of the coefficient of thermal expansion, an important functional property, is extremely sensitive to molecular anisotropy. BTDA//ODA/MPD, which is almost isotropic, has an out-of-plane CTE that is approximately 20 percent higher than the in-plane CTE. In contrast, the out-of-plane CTE for the most anisotropic polyimide in this study, BPDA//PPD, is 25 times larger than the in-plane CTE. This sensitivity of the CTE to molecular orientation must be taken into account when modeling stress in, or designing, electronic devices.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 308: Symposium M1 – Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties IV , 1993 , 475
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 St. Clair, T. L., Polyimides , edited by Wison, D., Stenzenberger, H. D. and Hergenrother, P.M, (Blackie and Son, Ltd. Publishers, London, 1990) pp. 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Bauer, C. L. and Farris, R., J. Polym. Engr. Sci., 28 (10), 688 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Bauer, C. L. and Farris, R., J. Polym. Engr. Sci., 29 (16), 1107 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Bauer, C. L. and Farris, R., in Polvimides: Materials. Chemistry and Characterization. edited by Feger, C., Khojasteh, M. M. and McGrath, J. E. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1985), p 549.Google Scholar
5 Pan, J. T. and Poon, S., in Electronic Packaging Materials Science IV: edited by Jacodine, R., Jackson, K. A., Lillie, E. D. and Sundahl, R. C., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 154, Pittsburgh, PA, 1989) p 27.Google Scholar
6 Feger, C., Tong, H. M., Han, B. J. and Gryte, C. C., 49th Annual SPE Technical Conference Proceedings (Montreal, Canada, 1991) p 1742.Google Scholar
7 Coburn, J. C. and Pottiger, M. T., in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Polvimides. edited by Feger, C. (Technomic Publishers, Lancaster, PA, 1991), p360.Google Scholar
8 Noe, S. C., Pan, J. Y. and Senturia, S. D., in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Polvimides edited by Feger, C. (Technomic Publishers, Lancaster, PA, 1991).Google Scholar
9 Russell, T. P., Gugger, H. and Swalen, J. H. D., J. Poly. Sci., Polym. Phys. ed. 21, 1745 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Pottiger, M. T. and Coburn, J. C. in Materials Science of High Temperature Polymers for Microelectronics edited by Grubb, D. T., Mita, I and Yoon, D. Y. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 227, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991) p187.Google Scholar
11 Han, B. J., Gryte, C. C., Tong, H. M. and Feger, C., Proc. ANTEC ‘88, 34, 994 (1988).Google Scholar
12 Pottiger, M. T. and Coburn, J. C., Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. of Poly. Mat.: Sci. and Eng. 66, 194(1992).Google Scholar
13 Lin, L. and Bidstrup, S. A., Proc. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. of Poly. Mat.: Sci. and Eng. 66, 265 (1992).Google Scholar
14 Molis, S. E., Saraf, R., and Hodgson, R. T., ANTEC ‘91 Proc., 1700 (1991).Google Scholar
15 Yoon, D. Y., Parrish, W., Depero, I.E. and Ree, M.in Materials Science of High Temperature Polymers for Microelectronics, edited by Grubb, D. T., Mita, I and Yoon, D. Y. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 227, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991) p 387.Google Scholar
16 Jou, J.-H. and Huang, P.-T., Macromolecules 24, 3796 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Ree, M., Nunes, T. L. and Kirby, D. P., ACS Polym. Preprints 33 (1) 309 (1992)Google Scholar
18 Samuels, R. J., Structured Polymer Properties. (John Wiley and Sons Publishers, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
19 Freilich, S. C. and Gardner, K. H., in Polvimides- Materials. Chemistry and Characterization, edited by Feger, C., Khojasteh, M. M. and McGrath, J. E. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1985), p 513–525.Google Scholar
20 Boese, D., Lee, H., Yoon, D. Y., Swalen, J. D. and Rabolt, J. F., J. Poly. Sci.: Part B: Polym. Phys. 30, pp1321–1327 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Zoller, P., Bolli, P., Pahud, V. and Ackermann, H., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 47 (8), 948 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Pryde, C. A., J. Poly. Sci.: Part A: Poly. Chem. 27, 711 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Ishida, H., Wellinghoff, S. T., Baer, E. and Koenig, J. L., Macromolecules 13, 826, (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Cakmak, M., Spruiell, J. E., White, J. L. and Lin, J. S., Polym. Engr. Sci. 27 (12), 893 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar