Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:22:26.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solid-Phase Epitaxial Growth of Amorphized GaAs: The Influence of Microscopic and Macroscopic Non-Stoichiometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

K.B. Belay ,
D.J. Llewellyn  and
M.C. Ridgway
K.B. Belay
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Materials Engineering, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
D.J. Llewellyn
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Materials Engineering, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia Electron Microscopy Unit, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
M.C. Ridgway
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Materials Engineering, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Get access

Abstract

The solid-phase epitaxial growth of amorphized GaAs has been characterized to investigate the influence of both microscopic and macroscopic non-stoichiometry on the onset of twinning and subsequent interfacial non-planarity. Microscopic non-stoichiometry or equivalently, chemical disorder on an atomic scale, was produced by implanting samples with equal doses of both Ga and As ions. In such samples, the onset of twinning and interfacial non-planarity where independent of the energy deposited in vacancy production, the latter considered a first estimate of relative differences in microscopic non-stoichiometry between samples. Twinning and interfacial non-planarity are thus independent of microscopic non-stoichiometry or alternatively, microscopic non-stoichiometry may approach saturation over the given dose range. In contrast, macroscopic non-stoichiometry produced by implanting samples with Ga or As ions influenced both the onset of twinning and interfacial non-planarity. Excess Ga was observed to have a greater effect than excess As. The influence of a macroscopic non-stoichiometry may be indicative that the availabiltiy of a lattice constitutent and/or defect is rate-limiting during solid-phase epitaxial growth. Macroscopic non-stoichiometry may also yield preferrential nuclueation sites for twinning and in the presence of excess Ga, molten precipitates could contribute to an observed rapid amorphous-to-crystalline transformation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 398: Symposium C – Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Phase Transformations , 1995 , 393
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Williams, J.S. and Austin, M.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36 (1980) 994.Google Scholar
2 Nissim, Y.S., Christel, L.A., Sigmon, T.W., Gibbons, J.F., Magee, T.J. and Ormond, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 39 (1981)598.Google Scholar
3 Speriosu, V.S., Paine, B.M., Nicolet, M-A. and Glass, H.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 40 (1982) 604.Google Scholar
4 Sadana, D.K., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B7/8 (1985) 375 and references therein.Google Scholar
5 Grimaldi, M.G., Paine, B.M., Maenpaa, M., Nicolet, M-A. and Sadana, D.K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 39 (1981) 70.Google Scholar
6 Licoppe, C., Nissim, Y.I., Meriadec, C. and Krauz, P., J. Appl. Phys. 60 (1986) 1352.Google Scholar
7 Gamo, K., Inada, T., Mayer, J.W., Eisen, F.H. and Rhodes, C.R., Rad. Eff. 33 (1977) 85.Google Scholar
8 Opyd, W.G., Gibbons, J.F., Bravman, J.C. and Parker, M.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49 (1986) 974.Google Scholar