Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:42:01.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Si and GexSi1−x Epitaxial Growth on SOI Structures by Rapid Thermal Processing Chemical Vapor Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

T. Y. Hsieh ,
K. H. Jung ,
D. L. Kwong ,
S. Lin  and
H. L. Marcus
T. Y. Hsieh
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
K. H. Jung
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
D. L. Kwong
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
S. Lin
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
H. L. Marcus
Affiliation:
Center for Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
Get access

Abstract

A short time high temperature H2 pre-bake resulted in an undulating SIMOX surface, which planarized after epitaxial growth by rapid thermal processing chemical vapor deposition (RTPCVD). However, a short time, high temperature N2 pre-bake resulted in severe surface pitting. From dilute Schimmel etch results, no significant changes in the defect densities of the Si layers occurred after RTPCVD. Auger depth profiles of the SOI substrate prior to epitaxial growth show an oxygen peak in the SIMOX Si layer. However, the peak flattens out after epitaxial growth. Oxygen was not observed in the epitaxial film, even though oxygen was still observed in the SIMOX top Si layer.

The use of GexSi1−x epitaxial layers to reduce threading dislocation densities was examined. A 1000°C Si buffer layer was first grown for 30s, followed by a GexSi1−x layer, and topped off by a 1000°C Si layer for 120s. The GexSi1−x layers were grown at temperatures varying from 850°C to 1000°C for 30s to 240s. The defect density was significantly reduced when the 900°C and 850°C GexSi1−x layers were used, although an increase in stacking fault densities (still small compared to threading dislocation densities) accompanied the lower deposition temperatures. The 1000°C GexSi1−x layer and a control sample in which pure Si was grown showed no significant decrease in defect densities.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 224: Symposium F – Rapid Thermal and Integrated Processing I , 1991 , 285
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lam, H. W., IEDM Technical Digest, (IEEE, NY, 1983), pp. 348–351.Google Scholar
2 Izumi, K., Doken, M., and Ariyoshi, H., Electron. Lett. 14, 593 (1978).Google Scholar
3 Liaw, H. M., Tomozane, M., and Fejes, P. L., Extended Abstracts, 445, The Electrochemical Society Spring Meeting (The Electrochemical Society Inc.: Pennington, 1990).Google Scholar
4 Lee, S. K., Ku, Y. H., and Kwong, D. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 1775 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Schmidt, D. and Schneider, J., in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Chemical Vapor Deposition, ed. by Cullen, G. W., 87–8, 224 (The Electrochemical Society Inc.: Pennington, 1987).Google Scholar
6 Lam, H. W., Epitaxial Silicon Technology, ed. by Baliga, J., 269, (Academic Press: New York, 1986).Google Scholar
7 Jaussaud, C., Margall, J., Stoemenos, J., and Bruel, M., Silicon-on-insulator and Buried Metals in Semiconductors, 107, 17, (Materials Research Society: Pittsburgh, 1988).Google Scholar
8 Hill, D., Fraundorf, P., and Fraundorf, G., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 4933 (1988).Google Scholar
9 Mao, B. Y., Chang, P. H., Lam, H. W., Shen, B. W., and Keenan, J. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 794 (1986).Google Scholar
10 Mogro-Campero, A., Love, R. P., Lewis, N., Hall, E. L., and McConnell, M. D., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 2103 (1986).Google Scholar
11 Kamins, T. I., Wang, K. L., Park, J., and Davis, G. E., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1505 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Tomozane, M. and Liaw, H. M., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 28, L2050 (1989).Google Scholar