Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:50:43.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selective Detection of Cholesterol Using Carbon Nanotube Based Biochip

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Somenath Roy
Affiliation:
Harindra Vedala
Affiliation:
Won Bong Choi
Affiliation:
Get access

Abstract

A novel type of working electrode based on MWCNT is fabricated on silicon substrate for detection of total cholesterol. Multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWNT), which are vertically grown on a silicon platform, promote heterogeneous electron transfer between the enzyme and the working electrode. Immobilization of cholesterol oxidase (Pseudomonas fluorescens.) on the electrode is done by entrapment of the enzyme in a bio-friendly, water soluble polymer, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), which also increases the hydrophilicity of the carbon nanotube (CNT) surface (with experimental evidence) and thereby facilitating the intimate attachment of the protein molecules. Cyclic voltammograms exhibit efficient detection of cholesterol in the range of 100-300 mg/dl, which covers the entire range of possible cholesterol concentration in human blood. The influence of interferents, like glucose, ascorbic acid and uric acid, present in the physiological fluids, is also examined. Owing to its compatibility with standard silicon microfabrication technology, the signal processing circuitry can also be integrated onto the same silicon substrate yielding a compact miniaturized biochip.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. National Cholesterol Education Program, Arch. Intern. Med. 36, 148 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Allain, C.C., Poon, L.S. and Chan, C.S., Clin. Chem. 20, 470 (1974).Google Scholar
3. Bescombes, J.L., Cosnier, S. and Labbe, P., Talanta 43, 1615 (1996)Google Scholar
4. Li, G., Liao, J.M., Hu, G.Q., Ma, N.Z. and Wu, P.J., Biosensors and Bioelectronics 20, 2140 (2005).Google Scholar
5. McCreery, R.L., in Electroanalytical Chemistry, edited by Bard, A.J., (Marcel Dekker: New York, 1991), p. 221.Google Scholar
6. Choi, Y. and Choi, W., Carbon 43 (2005) 2737.Google Scholar
7. Vedala, H., Huang, J., Zhou, X.Y., Kim, G., Roy, S. and Choi, W. B., Applied Surface Science, (2005) (in press).Google Scholar
8. Roy, S., Vedala, H. and Choi, W.B., Nanotechnology 16 (2005) (in press)Google Scholar
9. Ohba, T. and Kaneko, K. Phys. Chem. 106, 7171 (2002)Google Scholar