Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:24:46.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Porcelain on Display Decorative and other Uses of Oriental Porcelain in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Oliver R. Impey*
Affiliation:
The Ashmolean Museum, Oxford University, England
Get access

Abstract

Chinese porcelain began to reach Europe in quantity in the late fifteenth century, Japanese in the mid seventeenth. Apart from a brief interlude in the mid seventeenth century, Chinese porcelain was imported until well into the nineteenth century, Japanese only until the 1740s. This porcelain was at first a rarity, to be mounted in precious-metal mounts or kept in the Cabinet of Curiosities. Soon it was to be displayed as part of the decorative effect in a room, while in some cases it became the decorative effect; the porcelain room. Porcelain was imitated in Europe and not much used until it was cheap enough. As the “China-mania” died, porcelain was kept as part of room decoration, often in the new china cupboards.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and references

1.Now in the National Gallery, Washington. See Arthur Spriggs, “Oriental porcelain in Western paintings”, Transactions of the Oriental ceramic Society, 36, 1964-6, pp.124–33.Google Scholar
2.For the trade see Volker, T., “Porcelain and the Dutch East India Company”, Mededelingen van het Rijksmuseum voor Volkenkunde, Leiden, 11, 1954 and Volker, T., “The Japanese porcelain trade of the Dutch East India Company after 168311, Mededelingen van het Riiksmuseum voor Volkenkunde. Leiden, 13, 1959.Google Scholar
3. Lightbown, R. W., “Oriental Art and the Orient in Late Renaissance and Baroque Italy”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 32, 1969, pp.. 228-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Rinaldi, Maura, Kraak Porcelain, London, 1989.Google Scholar
5. , Volker, 1954, op. cit. (note 2).Google Scholar
6.Spriggs, 1964-6, op. cit. (note 1), illustrates several examplesGoogle Scholar
7.Manuscript inventory, 1629, Hatfield House.Google Scholar
8.Illustrated in Peter Thornton, Seventeenth-century Interior Decoration in England, France and Holland, New Haven and London, 1978, fig.232. (Musge d1art et d1histoire, Geneva).Google Scholar
9.“The linen chest”, the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
10.“Girl interrupted at her music”, the FrickCollection, New York. For other examples seeSpriggs, 1964-6, op. cit. (note 1), pls 71-6.Google Scholar
11.Quoted in Anna Somers Cocks, “The non-functionaluse of ceramics in the English Country-house duringthe eighteenth century”, Studies in the History ofArt, 25, 1989, pp.195– 216.Google Scholar
12.Illustrated in Mark Hinton and Oliver Impey,Kakiemon porcelain from the Enqlish Country House,London, 1989, fig. 2.Google Scholar
13.Manuscript inventory, 1688, Burghley House.Google Scholar
14.For an example see Thornton, op. cit. (note 8),p1.74.Google Scholar
15.See Oliver Impey, “Porcelain for Palaces”, in JohnAyers, Oliver Impey and Mallet, J.V.G., Porcelain forPalaces, London, 1990, p. 58. Se also Tove Clemmensen and Mogens Mackeprang, B., Kina og Danmark, Copenhagen, 1980, fig. 27.Google Scholar
16.Thornton, op. cit. (note 8), pp.249, 383 and note 22.Google Scholar
17.Daisy Lion-Goldschmidt, “Les porcelaines chinoisesdu palais de Santos”, Arts Asiatictues, 25, 1984,pp. 6-72.Google Scholar
18.Illustrated in Reidemeister, L., “Die Porzellankabinette der Brandenburgisch-PreuzischenSchlsser”, Jahrbuch der PreuzischenKunstsammlungen, Part 1, 54, 1933, pp. 262–72, p1.8.Google Scholar
19. Erkelens, A.M.L.E., “Delfts aardewerk op Het Loo”,Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek, 31, 1980,pp.263-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Nicodemus Tessin quoted by Robert J.Charleston “Porcelain as room decoration in.eighteenth-centuryEngland”, Antiques, 96, 1969, p., 894.Google Scholar
21. Marot, Daniel, Nouvelles cheminees faittes enplusiers endroits de la Hollande et autresprovinces, (Holland c. 1695).Google Scholar
22. Marot, Daniel, Nouveaux livres de Partements,London, before 1702.Google Scholar
23. Defoe, Daniel, A Tour thro’ the Whole Island of Great Britain, ed. Cole, G.D.H., 2 vols., London, 1968, I.p.175.Google Scholar
24. Scheurleer, Th. H. Lunsingh, “Documents on thefurnishing of Kensington House”, Journal of the Walpole Society, 38, 1962, pp.1558.Google Scholar
25.See Lane, Arthur, “Queen Mary II's porcelaincollection at Hampton Court”, Transactions of the Oriental Ceramic Society, 25, 1949-50, pp. 2131;but see also Impey 1990, op. cit. (note 15) p.65and note 41.Google Scholar
26. Shulsky, Linda, “Queen Mary's collection of Porcelain and.Delft and its display at KensingtonPalace”, American Ceramic Society Journal, 1990,pp. 51-74.Google Scholar
27. Scheurleer, Lunsingh, 1962, op. cit. (note 24).Google Scholar
28.Reidemeister, 1933, op. cit. (note 18), p. 264.Google Scholar
29. Broebes, Jean-Baptiste, Vues des palais et maisonsde plaisance de Sa Maieste le Roy de Prusse,Augsburg, 1733.Google Scholar
30.For an example see Ayers, Impey and Mallet, 1990,op. cit. (note 15),no. 138.Google Scholar
31. Goethe, Eosander von in Merian, M., Theatrum Europeii XVI and XVII, Frankfurt, 1717 and 1718.Google Scholar
32.Impey in Ayers, Impey and Mallet, 1990, op. cit. (note 15), pp. 60–1.Google Scholar
33.The porcelain was made by potters in and around Arita for this replica of the Porzellanzimmer ofCharlottenburg.Google Scholar
34. Bott, Gerhard, ed., Die Grafen von Schonborn,Nuremburg, 1989.Google Scholar
35.This may be unique; most collections featured thoseporcelains that were available, though much carewas exercised in their symmetrical arrangement.Google Scholar
36. Kleiner, Salomon, Representation au naturel deschateaux de Wiessenstein au desus de Pommersfeld,et celui de Geubach.., Augsburg, 1728.Google Scholar
37. Sponsel, Jean-Louis, Kabinettstucke der MeissnerPorzellan- Manufaktur von Johann Joachim K9ndler,Leipzig, 1900.Google Scholar
38. Reichel, Friedrich, Early Japanese porcelain,London, 1981, on pp. 120–1, and Ayers, Impey and Mallet, 1990, op. cit. (note 15), fig.16.Google Scholar
39. , Ayers, Impey and Mallet, 1990, op. cit. (note 15),fig.17.Google Scholar
40. Bencard, Mogens “The glass cabinet at RosenborgPalace”, Journal of the History of Collections, 3, 1991, pp. 112. and Clemmensen and Mackeprang, 1980, op. cit. (note 15), fig. 46.Google Scholar
41.Quoted in Reichel, 1981, op. cit. (note 38), p. 62.Google Scholar
42.See Impey, Oliver, “Eastern trade and the furnishingof the British Country House” Studies in the History of Art, 25, 1989, pp.177914.Google Scholar
43. Huth, Hans, Lacquer of the West, Chicago, 1971.Google Scholar
44. Setterwall, Ake, Kina Slott p& Drottningholm, Malmo, 1972, p. 81.Google Scholar
45. Chippendale, Thomas, The Gentleman and Cabinet-maker's Director, third edition, London, 1762, Nos. 131–7.Google Scholar
46. Cocks, Somers, 1989, op. cit. (note 11).Google Scholar
47.Sometimes dolls houses had miniatures made of glassin imitation of Chinese or Japanese miniatureporcelains; see Jet Pijzel-Dommisse, Het Poppenhuisvan Petronella de la Court, Utrecht, 1987.Google Scholar
48.See, e.g. Impey, Oliver, Chinoiserie, Oxford, 1977,pl. opposite p. 165.Google Scholar
49.For examples see Hayward, Helena, Johnson, Thomas and Rococo, Enqlish, London, 1964, Nos. 96–7 and 125.Google Scholar
50. Hardy, John and Tomlin, Maurice, Osterley Park House,London, 1985, pl. 58.Google Scholar
51.Quoted in Hardy and Tomlin, 1985, op. cit (note 50)pp.105-6 from a letter written by Lady Beauchamp Proctor in 1772.Google Scholar
52.Hugh Honour, Chinoiserie: the vision of Cathay,London, 1961.Google Scholar
53.For examples see Watson, F.J.B. and Gillian Wilson,Mounted oriental porcelain in the J. Paul GettyMuseum, Malibu, 1982, pls. 12, 15 and 17.Google Scholar
54.For examples see Ayers, Impey and Mallet, 1990, op.cit. (note 15), no.152.Google Scholar
55.See , Watson and , Wilson, 1982, op. cit. (note 53),pl. 14.Google Scholar
56.Illustrated in Ayers, Impey and Mallet, 1990, op.cit. (note 15), no. 147.Google Scholar
57.This elephant is the same model as those at Burghley house mentioned in the 1688 inventory op.cit. (note 13). See The Burghley Porcelains,catalogue of an exhibition held in the Japan Society Galleries, New York, 1986, no. 93.Google Scholar
58.For other examples see Watson and Wilson, 1982, op.cit. (note 53).Google Scholar
59.Illustrated in Ayers, Impey and Mallet, 1990, op.cit. (note 15), no. 245.Google Scholar
60.The front and the back of the box is of JapaneseImari, the sides of the box and the top, front and back and the sides of the lid are of Chinese Imari.Google Scholar
61.Hinton and Impey, 1989, op. cit. (note 12), p.18.Google Scholar
62.Illustrated in Ayers, Impey and Mallet, 1990, op.cit. (note 15),. fig. 4.Google Scholar
63.Jean-Dominique-Auguste Ingres, “Le bain turc”,Musee du Louvre, Paris. See, e.g., Inqres,catalogue of an exhibition held at the PetitPalais, Paris, 1967-8, No. 260.Google Scholar
64.John Ayers “The early China Trade” in Oliver Impeyand Arthur MacGregor, The Origins of Museums,Oxford, 1985, pp. 259–66.Google Scholar
65.See Jerg, C.J.A., The Geldermalsen: history and porcelain, Groningen, 1986, for a ship's cargo oftrade porcelain of the mid eighteenth century.Google Scholar
66.For examples from the Brighton Pavilion see Ayers,Impey and Mallet, 1990, op. cit. (note 15) nos. 71and 152.Google Scholar