Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:59:28.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Persistent Photoinduced Changes in Charge States of Donors and Acceptors in Hydrothermally Grown ZnO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Nancy C. Giles
Affiliation:
[email protected], West Virginia University, Physics, Hodges Hall, Morgantown, WV, 26506, United States
Yongquan Jiang
Affiliation:
[email protected], West Virginia University, Physics Department, Morgantown, WV, 26506, United States
Xiaocheng Yang
Affiliation:
[email protected], West Virginia University, Physics Department, Morgantown, WV, 26506, United States
S. M. Evans
Affiliation:
[email protected], West Virginia University, Physics Department, Morgantown, WV, 26506, United States
L. E. Halliburton
Affiliation:
[email protected], West Virginia University, Physics Department, Morgantown, WV, 26506, United States
Get access

Abstract

Bulk ZnO grown by the hydrothermal technique was investigated using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), photoluminescence (PL), and infrared absorption (FTIR) techniques. Isolated subsitutional lithium is the dominant acceptor and could be detected using EPR or PL. A large concentration of neutral Li+-OH centers were observed using FTIR data. EPR spectra assigned to Mn, Co, Ni, Fe, and Group III (Al, Ga) donors were also observed. Photoinduced changes in the charge states of the different deep and shallow centers were produced using 325 nm light, and the stability of these changes were monitored with EPR during pulsed thermal anneals. The charge-state changes for some defects were persistent and remained up to 300 K. These impurities, when present in device structures, may act as stable charge trapping sites.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Schirmer, O. F., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 29, 1407 (1968).Google Scholar
2. Schirmer, O. F. and Zwingel, D., Solid State Commun. 8, 1559 (1970).Google Scholar
3. Halliburton, L. E., Wang, L., Bai, L., Garces, N. Y., Giles, N. C., Callahan, M. J., and Wang, B., J. Appl. Phys. 96, 7168 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Dorain, P. B., Phys. Rev. 112, 1058 (1958).Google Scholar
5. Walsh, W. W. and Rupp, L. W., Phys. Rev. 126, 952 (1962).Google Scholar
6. Holton, W. C., Schneider, J., and Estle, T. L., Phys. Rev. 133, 1638 (1964).Google Scholar
7. Hausmann, A., Phys. Stat. Sol. 31, K131 (1969).Google Scholar
8. Block, D., Herve, A., and Cox, R. T., Phys. Rev. B 25, 6049 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Gonzalez, C., Block, D., Cox, R. T., and Herve, A., J. Cryst. Growth 59, 357 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Meyer, B. K., Alves, H., Hofmann, D. M., Kriegseis, W., Forster, D., Bertram, F., Christen, J., Hoffmann, A., Strassburg, M., Dworzak, M., Haboeck, U., and Rodina, A. V., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 241, 231 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Dingle, R., Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 579 (1969).Google Scholar