Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:27:48.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modelling uranium leaching from agricultural soils to groundwater as a criterion for comparison with complementary safety indicators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

D. Jacques
Affiliation:
Waste and Disposal Department, SCK•CEN, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
J. Šimůnek
Affiliation:
University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
D. Mallants
Affiliation:
Waste and Disposal Department, SCK•CEN, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
M.Th. van Genuchten
Affiliation:
George E. Brown, Jr. Salinity Laboratory, 450 W Big Springs RD, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
Get access

Abstract

Naturally occurring radionuclides can also end up in soils and groundwater due to human practices, such as application of certain fertilizers in agriculture. Many mineral fertilizers, particularly (super)phosphates, contain small amounts of 238U and 230Th which eventually may be leached from agricultural soils to underlying water resources. Field soils that receive P-fertilizers accumulate U and Th and their daughter nuclides, which eventually may leach to groundwater. Our objective was to numerically assess U migration in soils. Calculations were based on a new reactive transport model, HP1, which accounts for interactions between U and organic matter, phosphate, and carbonate. Solid phase interactions were simulated using a surface complexation module. Furthermore, all geochemical processes were coupled with a model accounting for dynamic changes in the soil water content and the water flux. The capabilities of the code in calculating natural U fluxes to groundwater were illustrated using a semi-synthetic 200-year long time series of climatological data for Belgium. Based on an average fertilizer application, the input of phosphate and uranium in the soil was defined. This paper discusses calculated U distributions in the soil profile as well as calculated U fluxes leached from a 100-cm deep soil profile. The calculated long-term leaching rates originating from fertilization are significantly higher after 200 years than estimated release rates from lowlevel nuclear waste repositories.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] MIRA Milieu- en natuurrapport Vlaanderen, www.milieurapport.be, 117 p. (2004).Google Scholar
[2] EC, Radiation Protection 95: Reference levels for workplaces processing materials with enhanced levels of naturally occurring radionuclides. A guide to assist implementation of Title VII of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive (BSS) concerning natural radiation sources, (1999).Google Scholar
[3] Congé, F., L'énergie nucléaire dans notre environment radioactive, RGN, nr 2 (1993).Google Scholar
[4] UNSCEAR, Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Vol. I., 654 p. (2000).Google Scholar
[5] Zielinski, R.A., Asher-bolinder, S., Meier, L., Johnson, C.A. and Sazbo, B.J., Appl. Geochim., 12, 921 (1997).Google Scholar
[6] Guzman, E.T.R., Alberich, M.V.E., Regil, E.O., J. Radioanal. and Nuclear Chem., 254, 509517 (2002).Google Scholar
[7] Jacques, D. and Šimůnek, J., BLG-998, SCK•CEN, Mol, Belgium, 79 p (2005).Google Scholar
[8] Šimůnek, J., Šejna, M., and Genuchten, M.Th. van, IGWMC-TPS-70, 202 p. (1998).Google Scholar
[9] Parkhurst, D.L., and Appelo, C.A.J., Water Resourc. Invest., Report 99-4259, 312 p. (1999).Google Scholar
[10] Jacques, D., Šimůnek, J., Mallants, D., and Genuchten, M. Th. van in Proc. Of ICEM '05: The 10th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation (2005).Google Scholar
[11] Wouters, L., and Vandenberghe, N., Geologie van de Kempen, een synthese, NIROND-94-11 (1994).Google Scholar
[12] Seuntjens, P., Reactive solute transport in heterogeneous porous media. Cadmium leaching in acid sandy soil, PhD, University of Antwerp, 236 p (2000).Google Scholar
[13] Genuchten, M. Th.van, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892898 (1980).Google Scholar
[14] Brady, N.C., The nature and properties of soils, tenth edition, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, 621 p. (1990).Google Scholar
[15] Tipping, E., Cation binding by humic substances, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 434 p. (2002).Google Scholar
[16] Appelo, C.A.J., Verweij, E., and Schäfer, H., Appl. Geochem. 13, 257268 (1998).Google Scholar
[17] Waite, T.D., Davis, J.A., Payne, T.E., Waychuna, G.A., and Xu, N., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 58, 54655478 (1994).Google Scholar
[18] Dzombak, D.A., and Morel, F.M.M., Surface complexation modelling – Hydrous ferric oxide, New York, John Wiley, 393 p. (1990).Google Scholar
[19] McKinley, J.P., Zachara, J.M., Smith, S.C., and Turner, G.D, Clay and Clay Minerals, 43, 586598 (1995).Google Scholar
[20] Stolk, A.P., IVM Rapport 723101 056, 61 p (2001).Google Scholar
[21] Mallants, D., Weetjens, E., SCK •CEN-R-3801, 63 p. (2004).Google Scholar
[22] Mallants, D., Volckaert, G., SCK •CEN-R-3562rev.1, 208 p. (2003).Google Scholar