Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:55:44.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of Cementitious Materials on the Corrosion of Copper Canisters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Fraser King
Affiliation:
Integrity Corrosion Consulting Ltd, 6732 Silverview Drive NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada T3B 3K8
Lars Werme
Affiliation:
Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Box 5864, SE-102 40 Stockholm, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Cementitious materials could be used in an underground repository as seals, bulkheads, grouts, or to provide a smooth surface for vehicles in the rooms and tunnels during repository construction. There is a possibility that an alkaline plume could be released from the cementitious materials in the repository and impact the corrosion behaviour of the canisters. The available literature information on the corrosion and electrochemical behaviour of copper in alkaline environments has been reviewed. Alkaline conditions promote passivation of the canister, whereas the presence of chloride groundwaters supports general dissolution. Localized corrosion due to an alkaline plume is considered to be unlikely because the protectiveness of the passive film (as measured by the difference between the corrosion and pitting potentials) increases with increasing pH.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. King, F., Ahonen, L., Taxén, C., Vuorinen, U. and Werme, L., “Copper corrosion under expected conditions in a deep geologic repository,” SKB Technical Report TR-01–23 (2001) and Posiva Report 2002–01 (2002).Google Scholar
2. King, F., “Corrosion of copper in alkaline chloride environments,” SKB Technical Report TR-02–25 (2002).Google Scholar
3. King, F., Litke, C.D., Quinn, M.J. and LeNeveu, D.M., Corrosion Science 37, 833 (1995).Google Scholar
4. Strehblow, H.H. and Titze, B., Electrochim. Acta 25, 839 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Shoesmith, D.W., Rummery, T.E., Owen, D. and Lee, W., Electrochimica Acta 22, 1403 (1977).Google Scholar
6. Sutter, E.M.M., Fiaud, C. and Lincot, D., Electrochimica Acta 38, 1471 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Abdulhay, M.A. and Al-Suhybani, A.A., Mat. –wiss. u. Werkstofftech. 23, 407 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Gonzalez, S., Laz, M.M., Souto, R.M., Alvarezza, R.C. and Arvia, A.J., Corrosion 49, 450 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Laz, M.M., Souto, R.M., González, S., Salvarezza, R.C. and Arvia, A.J., J. Appl. Electrochem. 22, 1129 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Gad Allah, A.G., Abou-Romia, M.M., Badawy, W.A. and Rehan, H.H., Werkstoffe und Korrosion 42, 584 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Gennero de Chialvo, M.R., Salvarezza, R.C., Vasquez Moll, D. and Arvia, A.J., Electrochimica Acta 30, 1501 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Nishikata, A., Itagaki, M., Tsuru, T. and Haruyama, S., Corrosion Science 31, 287 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Figueroa, M.G., Salvarezza, R.C. and Arvia, A.J., Electrochimica Acta 31, 665 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Mor, E.D. and Beccaria, A.M., Br. Corros. J. 10, 33 (1975).Google Scholar
15. Vasquez Moll, D., de Chialvo, M.R.G., Salvarezza, R.C. and Arvia, A.J., Electrochim. Acta 30, 1011 (1985).Google Scholar