Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:27:17.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrodeposition of Metals on Conductive Polymer Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Maria Hepel
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, State University of New York at Potsdam, Potsdam, New York 13676
Laura Adams
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, State University of New York at Potsdam, Potsdam, New York 13676
Cynthia Rice-Belrose
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, State University of New York at Potsdam, Potsdam, New York 13676
Get access

Abstract

The electrodeposition of copper on composite conductive polymer polypyrrole/polystyrenesulfonate PPy(PSS) has been studied. The morphology of copper deposits was investigated in the presence of thiourea and other additives. It has been found that in the presence of thiourea in the solution, the rate of copper deposition on a PPy(PSS) substrate is slightly inhibited but the rate of copper stripping is faster than in its absence. The Electrochemical Quartz Crystal Microbalance (EQCM) technique allowed us to simultaneously monitor voltamperometric and resonance frequency vs. potential or time characteristics. The amount of electrodeposited copper was controlled by monitoring the EQCM resonant frequency. Composite PPy(PSS) films functioning as cation-exchange membranes were used as substrate materials for metal deposition. They allowed us to electrodeposit copper not only on the surface of the conductive polymer but also inside the polymer matrix. The size of copper nanocrystals formed inside the polymer was controlled by the applied electrode potential. Copper crystals as small as 20 nm were detected with Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Leone, A., Marino, W., and Scharifker, B. R., J. Electrochem. Soc., 139, 438 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Gotfesfeld, S., Uribe, F. A., and Armes, S. P., J. Eletrochem. Soc., 139, L14 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Lee, J. Y. and Tan, T. C., J. Electrochem. Soc., 137, 1402 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Chandler, G. K. and Pletcher, D., J. Appl. Electrochem., 16, 62 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Hepel, M. and Stephenson, R., Proc of Int. Tech. Conf. SUR/FIN'94, Indianapolis, IN, June 20–23, 1994, Am. Electroplaters and Surf. Fin. Soc, 1994, pp. 5167.Google Scholar
6. Hepel, M., Chen, M. and Stephenson, R., J. Electrochem. Soc., 143 [2], 498 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Tourillon, G. and Gamier, F., J. Phys. Chem., 88, 5281 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Holdcroft, S. and Funt, B. L., J. Electro-anal. Chem., 240, 89 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Kostecki, R., Ulmann, M., Augustynski, J., Strike, D. J., and Koudelka-Hep, M., J. Phys. Chem., 97, 8113 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Hepel, M., Proceedings of the Electrochem. Soc. Meeting, Los Angeles, CA May 6–10, 1996, (Eds.) Wieckowski, A. and Itaya, K., Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ, Vol. 96–8, 1996, pp. 456480.Google Scholar
11. Healy, J.P., Pletcher, D. and Goodenough, M., J. Electroanal. Chem., 338, 155 (1992).Google Scholar
12. Armstrong, M.J. and Muller, R.H., J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 2303 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Stoychev, D., Vitanova, I., Buynkliev, R., Petkova, N., Popova, I. and Pojarliev, I., J. Appl. Electrochem., 22, 987 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Jennings, H. S. and Rizzo, F. E., Met. Trans., 4, 921 (1973).Google Scholar
15. Szymaszek, A., Biernat, J. and Pajdowski, L., Electrochim. Acta, 22, 359 (1977).Google Scholar
16. Szymaszek, A., Pajdowski, L. and Biernat, J., Electrochim. Acta, 25, 985 (1980).Google Scholar
17. Suarez, D.F., Olson, F.A., J. Appl. Electrochem., 22, 1002 (1992).Google Scholar