Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:37:35.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design of composite channels for optimized transport in nitride devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Madhusudan Singh ,
Jasprit Singh  and
Umesh K. Mishra
Madhusudan Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109
Jasprit Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109
Umesh K. Mishra
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Get access

Abstract

Heterostructure field effect transistors (HFETs) based on AlGaN / GaN structures have shown good performance as high power and high frequency devices. Theoretical simulations of transport in short channel HFETs show that there are several areas where considerable improvements in mobility, etc. can be made if thin composite structures (as considered in this work) can be utilized. We examine transport in a metal / AlGaN / InN / GaN composite structure. The InN region is very thin (∼ 15 Å) and is introduced to improve the low field transport without significantly impacting the device breakdown properties. Our model is capable of examining any other type of composite structure as well. Our simulation method consists of charge control solution of the heterostructure wave functions, followed by Monte Carlo simulation of scattering and free flight events. We present comparison of results on i) metal / AlGaN / GaN structure, and ii) a metal / AlGaN / GaN structure with a thin InN channel of the order of a few mono-layers. We find that mobility in the channel can improve considerably with very little effect on the mobility - charge product. Indeed, the charge density induced in the thin InN channel region is ∼ 1013cm∼2. While the peak velocities in a metal / AlGaN / InN / GaN structure exhibit an increase of nearly 30% over the values in metal / AlGaN / GaN structures, the low field mobilities are also increased. Low-field mobilities of ∼ 2500 cm2 (V · s)∼ are predicted along with high sheet charges for low interface disorder for the structure with a thin InN layer. For higher degree of interface disorder (∼ 70Å), we have found good agreement with experimental Hall mobility data for similar structures. At higher electric fields, we find that most electron population transfers to higher valleys or other sub-bands that lie in AlGaN or GaN. This ensures that high field breakdown of low band gap InN layer is also suppressed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 798: Symposium Y – GaN and Related Alloys , 2003 , Y7.9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Davydov, V. Y., Klochikhin, A. A., Seisyan, R. P., Emstev, V. V., Ivanov, S. V., Bechstedt, F., Furthmüller, J., Harima, H., Mudryi, A. V., Aderhold, J., Smechinova, O., and Graul, J., Phys. Status Solidi B 229, R1 (2002).Google Scholar
[2] Davydov, V. Y., Klochikhin, A. A., Emtsev, V. V., Ivanov, S. V., Vekshin, V. V., Bechstedt, F., Furthmüller, J., Harima, H., Murdyi, A. V., Hashimoto, A., Yamamoto, A., Aderhold, J., Graul, J., and Haller, E. E., Phys. Status Solidi B 230, R4 (2002).Google Scholar
[3] Wu, J., Walukiewicz, W., Yu, K. M., J. W. A. , III, Haller, E. E., Lu, H., Schaff, W. J., Saito, Y., and Nanishi, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3967 (2002).Google Scholar
[4] Foutz, B. E., O'Leary, S. K., Shur, M. S., and Eastman, L. F., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 7727 (1999).Google Scholar
[5] Yokoyama, K. and Hess, K., Phys. Rev. B 33, 5595 (1986).Google Scholar
[6] Davis, R. F., Roskowski, A. M., Preble, E. A., Speck, J. S., Heying, B., Freitas, J. A. Jr, Glaser, E. R., and Carlos, W. E., Proc. IEEE 90, 993 (2002).Google Scholar
[7] Ambacher, O., Smart, J., Shealy, J. R., Weimann, N. G., Chu, K., Murphy, M., Schaff, W. J., Eastman, L. F., Dimitrov, R., Wittmer, L., Stutzmann, M., Rieger, W., and Hilsenbeck, J., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3222 (1999).Google Scholar
[8] Singh, M., Zhang, Y., Singh, J., and Mishra, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1867 (2000).Google Scholar
[9] Singh, M. and Singh, J., J. Appl. Phys. 94, 2498 (2003).Google Scholar
[10] Chin, V. W. L., Tansley, T. L., and Osotchan, T., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 7365 (1994).Google Scholar
[11] Reeber, R. R. and Wang, K., MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 6, 1 (2001).Google Scholar
[12] Vurgaftman, I., Meyer, J. R., and Ram-Mohan, L. R., J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5815 (2001).Google Scholar
[13] Majewski, J. A., Zandler, G., and Vogl, P., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 3511 (2002).Google Scholar
[14] Kane, E. O., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 8, 38 (1959).Google Scholar
[15] Meney, A. T., O'Reilly, E. P., and Adams, A. R., Semicond. Sci. Tech. 11, 897 (1996).Google Scholar
[16] Smorchkova, I. P., Elsass, C. R., Ibbetson, J. P., Ventury, R., Heying, B., Fini, P., Haus, E., DenBaars, S. P., Speck, J. S., and Mishra, U. K., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 4520 (1999).Google Scholar
[17] Tansley, T. L. and Foley, C. P., Electronics Lett. 20, 1066 (1984).Google Scholar
[18] Yamamoto, A., Shin-ya, T., Sugiura, T., and Hashimoto, A., J. Cryst. Growth 189/190, 461 (1998).Google Scholar
[19] Seeger, K., Semiconductor Physics - An Introduction (Springer-Verlag, 1999).Google Scholar