Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:11:26.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Critical Comparison Between Movpe and MBE Growth of III-V Nitride Semiconductor Materials for Opto-Electronic Device Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M.A.L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27603, [email protected] Department of Material Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27603
Zhonghai Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27603, [email protected]
J.D. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27603, [email protected]
F.A. Koeck
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27603, [email protected]
N.A. El-Masry
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27603
H.S. Kong
Affiliation:
Cree Research, Inc., Durham, NC
J.A. Edmond
Affiliation:
Cree Research, Inc., Durham, NC
J.W. Cook Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27603, [email protected]
J.F. Schetzina
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27603, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A systematic study of the growth and doping of GaN, AlGaN, and InGaN by both molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) and metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) has been performed. Critical differences between the resulting epitaxy are observed in the p-type doping using magnesium as the acceptor species. MBE growth, using rf-plasma sources to generate the active nitrogen species for growth, has been used for III-Nitride compounds doped either n-type with silicon or p-type with magnesium. Blue and violet light emitting diode (LED) test structures were fabricated. These vertical devices required a relatively high forward current and exhibited high leakage currents. This behavior was attributed to parallel shorting mechanisms along the dislocations in MBE grown layers. For comparison, similar devices were fabricated using a single wafer vertical flow MOVPE reactor and ammonia as the active nitrogen species. MOVPE grown blue LEDs exhibited excellent forward device characteristics and a high reverse breakdown voltage. We feel that the excess hydrogen, which is present on the GaN surface due to the dissociation of ammonia in MOVPE, acts to passivate the dislocations and eliminate parallel shorting for vertical device structures. These findings support the widespread acceptance of MOVPE, rather than MBE, as the epitaxial growth technique of choice for III-V nitride materials used in vertical transport bipolar devices for optoelectronic applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. , Strite and Morkoq, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10, 1237 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Pearton, S., GaN and Related Materials, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Netherlands, 1997.Google Scholar
3. Stringfellow, G.B., Organometallic Vapor Phase Epitaxy Theory and Practice, Academic Press, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
4. Herman, M.A. and Sitter, H. Molecular Beam Epitaxy Fundamentals and Current Status, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
5. Nakamura, S. and Fasol, G., The Blue Laser Diode Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
6. Doverspike, K., Bulman, G.E., Sheppard, S.T., Kong, H.S., Leonard, M., Dieringer, H., Weeks, T.W. Jr, Edmond, J., Brown, J.D., Swindell, J.T., Schetzina, J.F., Song, Y.K, Kuball, M., and Nurmikko, A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 482, 1169 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Hughes, W.C., Rowland, W. Jr, Johnson, M.A.L., Fujita, S., Cook, J.W. Jr, Schetzina, J.F., Ren, J., and Edmond, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 1571 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Johnson, M.A.L., Yu, Zhonghai, Boney, C., Rowland, W.H. Jr, Hughes, W.C., Cook, J.W. Jr, and Schetzina, J.F. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 449, 271 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Riechert, H., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 449, 149 (1997).Google Scholar
10. Hove, J. M. Van, Cosimini, G.J., Nelson, E., Wowchak, A.M., and Chow, P.P., J. Cryst. Growth 150, 908 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Johnson, M.A.L., Brown, J.D., El-Masry, N.A., Cook, J.W. Jr, Schetzina, J.F., Kong, H.S., and Edmond, J.A. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16, 1282 (1998).Google Scholar
12. Yoshimoto, N., Matsuoka, T., Sasaki, T., and Katsui, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2251 (1991).Google Scholar
13. Zsebok, O., Thordson, J.V., Anderson, T.G., MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res., 3 14 (1998).Google Scholar
14. Molnar, R.J. and Moustakis, T.D., J. Appl. Phys 76 4587 (1994).Google Scholar
15. Neugebauer, J. and Walle, C.G. Van de, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 395, 645 (1996).Google Scholar
16. Johnson, M.A.L., Yu, Zhonghai, Boney, C., Rowland, W.H. Jr, Hughes, W.C., Cook, J.W. Jr, and Schetzina, J.F. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 449, 215 (1997).Google Scholar
17. Buczkowski, S.L., Yu, Zhonhai, Richards-Babb, M., Giles, N.C., Romano, L.T. and Myers, T.H. 449, 197 (1997).Google Scholar