Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:58:22.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Creating Superhydrophobic Polycarbonate Fiber Network from Hydrophilic Polycarbonate through Electrospinning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Shuangwu Li
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Queen Mary College, University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Asa H. Barber
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Queen Mary College, University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Get access

Abstract

Considerable research has focused on the formation of superhydrophobic surfaces utilizing both the chemical composition of surfaces and geometric effects. In this study, a superhydrophobic polycarbonate (PC) network surface was produced from hydrophilic polycarbonate through electrospinning process. Complex surface geometries often related to material roughness is used to evaluate the wetting behavior of electrospun polycarbonate fiber network. The surface properties of electrospun polycarbonate fibers are therefore examined with the potential to exploit the fibers through enhancing hydrophobic behavior. Characterization and analysis of PC electrospun fiber and PC film surfaces were carried out to compare surface roughness with wetting contact angle. Analytical models are used to describe hydrophobicity in terms of roughness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lau, K. K. S., José, B., Kenneth, B. K. T., Manish, C., and Gehan, A. J., Nano Lett., 3, 12 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Huang, L., Lau, S. P., Yang, H. Y., Leong, E. S. P. and Yu, S. F., J. Phys. Chem. B., 16, 109 (2005).Google Scholar
3. Han, D. and Steckl, A. J., Langmuir., 25, 16 (2009).Google Scholar
4. Feng, L., Yang, Z., Jin, Z., Song, Y., Liu, B., Ma, Y., Yang, Z., Jiang, L. and Zhu, D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 42, 7 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Wenzel, R. N., Ind. Eng. Chem., 28, 8 (1936).Google Scholar
6. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B., Microsyst Technol., 7, 11 (2005).Google Scholar
7. Nosonovsky, M. and Bhushan, B., Microsyst Technol., 12, 3 (2006).Google Scholar
8. Cassie, A. B. D. and Baxter, S., Trans Faraday Soc., 40, 0 (1944).Google Scholar
9. Rucker, V. C., Havenstrite, K. L., Simmons, B. A., Sickafoose, S. M., Herr, A. E. and Shediac, R., Langmuir., 21, 17 (2005).Google Scholar
10. Li, S. W., Surface Properties of Electrospun Polymer Nanofibers, Queen Mary University of London. 2010.Google Scholar