Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:05:12.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis Of Congruent Matrix Release, Precipitation, And Time-Distributed Containment Failure On Spent Fuel Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Michael J. Apted  and
David W. Engel
Michael J. Apted
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
David W. Engel
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

The Analytical Repository Source-Term (AREST) code has been developed for source-term evaluation of spent fuel as a final waste form in geologic repositories. AREST contains a set of analytical equations for the timedependent diffusional mass transport of both solubility-limited and inventory-limited radionuclides from a spent fuel in a failed container surrounded by a shell of packing or other porous material imbedded in a porous host rock. Three factors that affect release performance are examined: 1) congruent dissolution of the UO2 matrix, 2) chemical instability of the UO2 matrix, with precipitation of a more stable uranium phase within the waste package, and 3) the attenuation of release rate by distribution of containment failures with time.

For congruent matrix dissolution, the release rates of included nuclides are proportional to the product of solubility-limited release of uranium and the fractional abundance of the nuclide. For certain conditions, congruent release rates are calculated to be up to 10 orders of magnitude lower than release rates assuming individual solubility-limits. Precipitation of a more stable, lower solubility uranium phase within the waste package is shown to increase release rates from the UO2 matrix compared to the non-precipitation case, in agreement with previous calculations. During the first 300 to 1000 years after repository closure, the distribution of containment failures with time will act to attenuate the peak average release rates of soluble, longlived nuclides, such as iodine-129, to values smaller than release rates below regulatory limits. However, for soluble nuclides with short half-lives, such as cesium-137, a broader distribution of containment failure with constant mean time of failure can actually cause an increase In the peak average release rates.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 303
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Apted, M.J., Liebetrau, A.L., and Engel, D.W., in Waste Management '87 Volume 2, edited by Post, R.G. (University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 1987) pp. 545–554.Google Scholar
[2] Yung, S.C., McLane, C.F., Anantatmula, R.P., Toyooka, R.T., and Terry, W.K., SD-BWI-TI-287 (Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, WA, 1987).Google Scholar
[3] Pigford, T.H. and Chambri, P.L., In Proceedings of Salt Repository Project's Workshop on Brine Migration, PNL/SRP-SA-14341 (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1987) pp. B.5–B.15.Google Scholar
[4] Kerrisk, J.F., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by Jantzen, C.M., Stone, J.A., and Ewing, R.C. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 237–244.Google Scholar
[5] LeNeveu, D.M., AECL-8383 (Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd., Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada 1986).Google Scholar
[6] Garisto, N.C. and Garisto, F., Ann. Nucd. Energy 13 (11), 591–596 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Karnbranslesakerhet (KBS), Final Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel - KBS-3, SKBF/KBS Report, Stockholm, Sweden (1983).Google Scholar
[8] Neretnieks, I., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII, edited by McVay, G.L. (North Holland, New York, NY, 1984) pp. 1009–1022.Google Scholar
[9] National Academy of Sciences (NAS), A Study of the Isolation System for Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Wastes (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1983).Google Scholar
[10] Pigford, T.H. and Chambré, P.L., in High-Level Nuclear Waste Disposal, edited by Burkholder, H.C. (Battelle Press, Columbus, OH, 1986) pp. 163–186.Google Scholar
[11] Liebetrau, A.M., Apted, M.J., Engel, D.W., Altenhofen, M.K., Reid, C.R., Strachan, D.M., Erikson, R.L., and Alexander, D.H., in Waste Management '87 Volume 2, edited by Post, R.G. (University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 1987) pp. 535–544.Google Scholar
[12] Johnson, L.H., Garisto, N.C., and Stroes-Gascoyne, S., in Waste Management '85, Volume 1, edited by Post, R.G. (University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 1985) pp. 479–482.Google Scholar
[13] Forsyth, R.S. and Werme, L.O., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, edited by Werme, L.O. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 327–336.Google Scholar
[14] Oversby, V.M., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, edited by Bates, J.K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 87–101.Google Scholar
[15] Zavoshy, S.J., Chambré, P.L., and Pigford, T.H., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by Jantzen, C.M., Stone, J.A., and Ewing, R.C. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 311–322.Google Scholar
[16] Chambré, P.L., Pigford, T.H., Lee, W.W., Ahn, J., Kajiwara, S., Kim, C.L., Kimura, H., Lung, H., Williams, W.J., and Zavoshy, S.J., LBL-19430 (Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 1985).Google Scholar
[17] Kim, C.L., Chambré, P.L., and Pigford, T.H., Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc. 52, 80 (1986).Google Scholar
[18] Disposal of Nuclear Radioactive Waste in Geologic Repositories. Title 10 CFR Part 60 (1983).Google Scholar
[19] Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes. Title 40 CFR Part 191 (1985).Google Scholar
[20] Garisto, F. and Garisto, N.C., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 90, 103–110 (1985).Google Scholar
[21] Baker, D.A., Bailey, W.J., Beyer, C.E., Bold, F.C., and Tawil, J.J., PNL-6258 (Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, 1987).Google Scholar
[22] Oversby, V.M. and Wilson, C.N., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, edited by Werme, L.O. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 337–347.Google Scholar
[23] Murphy, W.M. and Smith, R.W., WHC-SA-0090 (Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, WA, 1987).Google Scholar
[24] Wick, E.A., in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Source-Term for Radionuclide Migration from High-Level Waste or Spent Nuclear Fuel Under Realistic Repository Conditions, edited by Hunter, T.O. and Muller, A.B., SAND85–0380 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1985).Google Scholar
[25] Kim, C.L., Chambré, P.L., and Pigford, T.H., Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc. 50, 136–137 (1985).Google Scholar
[26] Bensky, M.S. and Oliver, D.L., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, edited by Werme, L.O. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 779–787.Google Scholar
[27] Pigford, T.H., UCB-NE-4088 (University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1986).Google Scholar