Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:16:26.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Writing about Atrocity: WartimeAccounts and their Contemporary Uses*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

PARKS M. COBLE
PARKS M. COBLE*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Department of History, 622 Oldfather Hall, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588–0327, USA, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In today's China, public memory of the War of Resistance againstJapan, 1937–1945, is more visible than ever. Museums, movies,television programmes, and commemorations focus heavily on the victimization ofthe Chinese people at the hands of the Japanese invaders. Japanese atrocities,particularly the Nanjing Massacre, are at the centre of much of thisremembering. But what of the wartime period? How did journalists and writersdiscuss Japanese atrocities? This paper finds that most wartime writing stressedthe theme of ‘heroic resistance’ by the Chinese ratherthan China's victimization at the hands of Japanese. Exceptions tothis approach included efforts to publicize Japan's action to Westernaudiences in the hope of gaining support for China's cause, and arelated focus on the bombing of the civilian population by the Japanese. Thispaper suggests major differences between the current approach to remembering thewar and to writing during the war itself.

Type
Part II: Remembering China's War with Japan: The Wartime Generation in Post-war China and East Asia
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 45 , Issue 2: China in World War II, 1937–1945: Experience, Memory, and Legacy , March 2011 , pp. 379 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Rose, C. (2005). Sino-Japanese Relations: Facing the Past, Looking to the Future, Routledge, London, p. 2Google Scholar.

2 The New York Times (24 April, 2009), p. A8. See also Mitter, R. (2003). Old Ghosts, New Memories: China's Changing War History in the Era of Post-Mao Politics, Journal of Contemporary History, 38:1, 127Google Scholar; Lam, P. (2005). Japan's Deteriorating Ties with China: The Koizumi Factor, China: An International Journal, 3:2, 275–291Google Scholar; Reilly, J. (2004). China's History Activists and the War of Resistance Against Japan: History in the Making, Asian Survey, 44:2, 276–294Google Scholar.

3 Denton, K. (2007). ‘Horror and Atrocity: Memory of Japanese Imperialism in Chinese Museums’, in Lee, C. K. and Yang, G., eds (2007). Re-envisioning the Chinese Revolution: The Politics and Poetics of Collective Memories in Reform China, Stanford University Press, Stanford, p. 248Google Scholar.

4 Hung, C. (1994). War and Popular Culture: Resistance in Modern China, 1937–1945, University of California Press, Berkeley, p. 152Google Scholar.

5 MacKinnon, S. (2008). Wuhan, 1938: War, Refugees, and the Making of Modern China, University of California Press, Berkeley, p. 63Google Scholar.

6 Hung, War and Popular Culture, pp. 171–172.

7 Unit 731 was a secret biological and chemical warfare unit of the Imperial Japanese Army headquarters in Harbin, northeast China during the Sino-Japanese War.

8 ‘Comfort women’ is a euphemism for women (mostly Korean and Chinese) who were forced to work in Japanese military brothels during the Sino-Japanese War and World War II.

9 Chang, I. (1997). The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II, Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar.

10 Hung, War and Popular Culture, p. 167.

11 Denton, ‘Horror and Atrocity’, p. 246.

12 Yang, J. (1938). Huzhan mihua [Secret talk of the battle of Shanghai], Liming shuju, Hankou, p. iGoogle Scholar.

13 Fenghuo [Beacon fire], (21 November, 1937), 12, 218.

14 ‘Diren kongjun shangwang de tongji’ [The statistics on the injuries from the enemy's air force], (1938) Dongfang zazhi [Eastern Miscellany], 35:1, 1.

15 For an analysis of Fan Changjiang's style see Charles, A. Laughlin (2002). Chinese Reportage: The Aesthetic of Historical Experience, Duke University Press, Durham, pp. 63–74Google Scholar.

16 Fan Changjiang (1938). ‘Gaobie Shanghai’ [Farewell to Shanghai], in Hu Lanxi, et al., Dongxian de chetui [Withdrawal on the eastern front], Shenghuo shudian, Xi'an, pp. 46–51.

17 Ibid., pp. 55–64.

18 Ibid., pp. 59–60.

19 Ibid., p. 62.

20 Xie, Bingying (2001). A Woman Soldier's Own Story: The Autobiography of Xie Bingying, Brissman, L. and Brissman, B., trans., Berkeley Books, New York, p. 273Google Scholar.

21 Xie, A Woman Soldier's Own Story, p. 274.

22 Fan Changjiang (1938a), ‘Gankai guo Jingling’ [An emotional departure from Nanjing], in Hu, Dongxian de chetui, p. 74.

23 Fan, Changjiang (2001). Fan changjiang xinwen ji [A collection of newspaper articles by Fan Changjiang], Shen, Pu , ed., Xinhua chuban she, Beijing, 2, 794Google Scholar.

24 Fan, Fan Changjiang xinwen ji, vol. 2, pp. 815–819.

25 The Marc Polo Bridge Incident of 7 July, 1937, led to the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War of 1937–1945.

26 Hu, Yuzhi (1996). Hu Yuzhi wenji, [The collected works of Hu Yuzhi], Sanlian chuban she, Beijing, 4, 67–68Google Scholar.

27 Fan, Changjiang et al. , (1969). Jiang Huai jian de yundong zhan [The movement war between the Yangzi and Huai rivers], Hong Kong, pp. 91–99Google Scholar.

28 Jin Yi (1938). ‘Shanghai shujian’ [Shanghai correspondence], in Hu, Dongxian chetui, p. 101.

29 One of the most widely circulated was Timperley, J. (1938). Japanese Terror in China, Modern Age Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar.

30 Reprinted in He Shengsui, Cheng Maiqing, eds (1999). Lunxian tongshi (The painful history of the occupied zone; Shanghai: Fudan daxue chuban she), vol. 2, pp. 482–483.

31 See for instance, Guo Moruo (1944). ‘Rikou de canku xinli zhi jiepou’ [Analyzing the Japanese bandits’ cruel mentality], in Yushu ji [A collection of dispatches] Lianying shudian, Chongqing, pp. 21–27. This article was originally published in March, 1938.

32 Qiyue [July], (1 February, 1938), 8, 233–235.

33 China Weekly Review, Supplement (19 March, 1928), pp. 10–11; Damei wanbao [Great American evening news], (3 April, 1938), p. 3; (5 April, 1938), p. 3.

34 Reprinted in He, Lunxian tongshi, vol. 2, pp. 488–490.

35 Kangzhan sanri kan (29 June, 1938), 85, pp. 5–6. For further discussion, see Coble, P. (2010). The Legacy of China's Wartime Reporting, 1937–1945: Can the Past Serve the Present?, Modern China, 36:4, 442–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Sekine, K. (2004). A Verbose Silence in 1939 Chongqing: Why Ah Long's Nanjing Could not Be Published, Modern Chinese Literature and Culture Resource Centre, http://mclc.osu.edu/rc/pubs/sekine.htm [accessed 21 December 2010]; Yunzhong, Shu (2000). Buglers on the Home Front: The Wartime Practice of the Qiyue School, State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 73–75Google Scholar; Berry, M. (2008). A History of Pain: Trauma in Modern Chinese Literature and Film, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 142–151Google Scholar. Berry suggests a more complex set of factors which prevented publication of the novel in 1939, including its implicit criticism of the GMD authorities.

37 A Long (2005). Nanjing xueji [Nanjing blood sacrifice], Ningxia renmin chuban she, Yinchuan, p. 197.

38 Liu, Liangmo , ‘Feiji he Zhongguo xiaohai’ [Airplanes and China's children], Dikang sanri kan (3 October, 1937), 14, 9–10Google Scholar.

39 Wenyi zhanxian [The literary battle line], edited by Ba Jin, in its first issue in February, 1939, noted that international propaganda work to promote China's cause remained essential to the war effort. See pp. 39–40.

40 Ba, Jin , ‘Suowei Riben kongjun de weili’ [The so‑called might of the Japanese air force], Fenghuo [Beacon fire], (5 September, 1937), 1, 5Google Scholar.

41 Nahan [War Cry], (25 August, 1938), 1, 29, reported that ‘This was clearly a Japanese bomb dropped from an airplane’.

42 Peattie, M. (2001). Sunburst: The Rise of the Japanese Naval Air Power, 1909–1941, Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, Maryland, pp. 116–119Google Scholar.

43 Fenghuo, (1 October, 1938), 19, 473–474.

44 Zhang, Mengyang (1938). ‘Riben fenghuang hongzha Guangzhou de fanxiang’ [Repercussions of Japan's crazed bombing of Guangzhou], Dongfang zazhi, 35:11, 2–3Google Scholar.

45 Fang, Jiada , ‘Ren zai siwang xiantu’ [People on the death line], Yuzhou feng [Cosmic Wind], (21 February, 1938), 61, 17–19Google Scholar.

46 Yu, X. (2005). Buddhism, War and Nationalism: Chinese Monks in the Struggle Against Japanese Aggressions, 1931–1945, Routledge, New York, pp. 95–96Google Scholar.

47 Peattie, Sunburst, pp. 116–118.

48 Taofen, Zou , ‘Zhanshi shoudu bei di kuangzha hou zenyang’ [What happens after the wartime capital is savagely bombed by the enemy], Quanmin kangzhan (5 May, 1939), 69, 1Google Scholar.

49 Qian, Junrui , ‘Muqian de shiju’ [The present situation], Dikang sanri kan (3 October, 1937), 14, 3–4Google Scholar.

50 Wang, Jiyuan , ‘Jianding women bisheng de zixin xin’ [Determined self–confidence that we must succeed], Dikang sanri kan (13 November, 1937), 26, 3Google Scholar.

51 Shi, Fuliang , ‘Zenyang cai buhui dongyao?’ [How can we stop wavering?], Wenhua zhanxian, (10 October, 1937) 5, 2Google Scholar.

52 Guowen zhoubao, (4 October, 1937), 14:33–35, 1.

53 Guowen zhoubao, (11 October, 1937), 14:36–38, 2–3.

54 Cathcart, A. and Nash, P. (2009). War Criminals and the Road to Sino-Japanese Normalization: Zhou Enlai and the Shenyang Trials, 1954–56’, Twentieth-Century China, 34:2, 89–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Zheng, Y. (1999). Discovering Chinese Nationalism in China: Modernization, Identity, and International Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 2Google Scholar.

56 Zheng, Discovering Nationalism, p. 51.

57 Gries, P. H. (2005). China's ‘New Thinking’ on Japan, The China Quarterly, 184, 846–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Mitter, R. (2005). A Slow Remembering: China's Memory of the War Against Japan, IIAS Newsletter, 38, 14Google Scholar. Chinese are certainly not alone in remembering themselves as victims in the war. Most other nations, including Japan, have a similar approach to war memory.

59 Coble, P. (2007). China's ‘New Remembering’ of the Anti-Japanese War of Resistance, 1937–1945, The China Quarterly, 190, 404–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar.