Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:08:28.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lokahitavadi and V. K. Chiplunkar: Spokesmen of Change in Nineteenth-Century Maharashtra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Mahadev L. Apte
Mahadev L. Apte
Affiliation:
Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Gopal Hari Deshmukh, popularly known by his pen name of Lokahitasvadi, and Vishnu Krishna Chiplunkar were two of the most prominent public figures in nineteenth-century Maharashtra. It is customary for both Indian and Western scholars to link them with literary and nationalist movements. Yet no effort has been made so far to assess their contribution by means of a survey of their work.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , March 1973 , pp. 193 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bose, N. S., The Indian Awakening and Bengal, 2nd ed. (Calcutta: N. S. Bose, 1959), p. 254;Google ScholarChand, Tara, History of the Freedom Movement in India, Vol. II (Delhi: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, 1967), pp. 269–73, 419–20, 600–1;Google ScholarHeimsath, Charles, Indian Nationalism and Hindu Social Reform (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964);CrossRefGoogle ScholarKumar, Ravinder, Western India in the Nineteenth Century (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1968), pp. 309–10;Google ScholarSeal, Anil, The Emergence of Indian Nationalism (London: Cambridge University Press, 1968), pp. 242–3.;CrossRefGoogle ScholarWolpert, Stanley A., Tilak and Gokhale: Revolution and Reform in the Making of Modern India (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962).Google Scholar

2 McDonald, Ellen E., ‘The Modernizing of Communication: Vernacular Publishing in Nineteenth-Century Maharashtra’, Asian Survey, Vol. VIII, No. 7 (07 1968), pp. 589–606;CrossRefGoogle ScholarKulkarnī, V. L., Marāţhī Jnāprasārak: Itihās va Vāhmaya Vicār (Bombay: Popular Prakāśan, 1965), pp. 6–15.Google Scholar

3 Jog, R. S. (ed.), Marāţhī Vānmayācā Itihās, Pt IV (Poona: Mahārāşţra Sāhitya Parisad, 1965), p. 39;Google ScholarTucker, Richard P., ‘The Proper Limits of Agitation: The Crisis of 1879–80 in Bombay Presidency’, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. XXVIII, No. 2 (02 1969), pp. 339–55.Google Scholar

4 Jog, op. cit., pp. 148–72.Google Scholar

5 Ibid., pp. 53–9.

6 Priolkar, A. K. (ed.), Lokahitavādīkrt Nibandha Sangraha, 2nd ed. (Bombay: Popular Prakāśan, 1967), B. pp. 1–68.Google Scholar Since different sections in this book have separate pagination but the same numeral types, references to pages in the biographical section are indicated by the letter ‘B’ preceding the page numbers.

7 Ibid., pp. 136–8, 81–6.

8 Ibid., pp. 38, 95–8, 137, 224, 238.

9 Ibid., p. 138.

10 Ibid., pp. 28–30, 58–9.

11 Ibid., pp. 58–9, 113–15, 131–2, 137.

12 Ibid., pp. 143–4, 151–3.

13 Ibid., p. 130.

14 Ibid., pp. 70–1, 161, 228–9.

15 Ibid., pp. 92, 108, 140, 146, 155, 160, 182–4.

16 Ibid., pp. 61–3.

17 Ibid., pp. 159, 162.

18 Ibid., p. 161.

19 Ibid., pp. 180–1, 185–7.

20 Ibid., pp. 163.

21 Ibid., pp. 161, 258–67.

22 Ibid., pp. 258–67.

23 Ibid., p. 161.

24 Heimsath, op. cit., pp. 16–17.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., p. 14.

26 Priolkar, op. cit., p. 71.Google Scholar

27 Ibid., p. 130.

28 Ibid., p. 176.

29 Ibid., pp. 102–4, 509.

30 Ibid., B. pp. 66–7.

31 Ibid., B. p. 68.

32 Ibid., p. 250. Similar apologies and requests to pay attention to his views occur in other essays also.Ibid., pp. 158, 163, 169, 231.

33 Ibid., p. 251.

34 Jāvadekar, Ācārya S. D., Ādhunik Bhārat, 3rd ed. (Poona: Sulubh Rāstriya Granthamālā, 1968), pp. 146–52, 161;Google ScholarBuddhisāgar, M. G. (ed.), Ciplunkar LekhaSangraha (Bombay: Popular Prakāśan, 1963), pp. 7–8, 11–12.Google Scholar

35 Buddhisāgar, op.cit., pp. 3–5.Google Scholar

36 Ibid., p. 18.

37 Ibid., pp. 19–23.

38 One just has to glance through Chiplunkar's later essays to find numerous references to these targets occurring almost every few pages.

39 Buddhisāgar, op. cit., pp. 135–6.Google Scholar

40 Ibid., p. 167.

41 Ibid., pp. 94–5.

42 Ibid., pp. 194–207.

43 Ibid., p. 257.

44 Ibid.

45 Heimsath, op. cit., pp. 208, 213.Google Scholar

46 Wolpert, op. cit., p. 297.Google Scholar

47 Phāţak, N. R., Ādarśa Bhāratsevak (Bombay: Mauj Prakāśan, 1967), pp. 233–76.Google Scholar

48 Kir, Dhananjaya, Mahātmā Fyotirāo Phule (Bombay: Popular Prakāšan, 1968), pp. 168–70.Google Scholar

49 Buddhisāgar, op. cit., p. 12.Google Scholar

50 Ibid., p. 92.

51 Ibid., pp. 54–60.

52 Kir, op. cit., pp. 168–70.Google Scholar

53 Ibid., p. 156. See also Priolkar, op. cit., B. pp. 53–5.

54 Kir, op. cit., p. 169.Google Scholar

55 Vālimbe, R. S., Ekonisāvyā Śatakāntil Mahārāşţrāci Sāmājik Punarghatanā (Poona, 1962), pp. 17–41.Google Scholar

56 Bose, op. cit., pp. 114–51, 168 f., 220–4 f., 289 f.; Heimsath, op. cit., pp. 113–30.Google Scholar