Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:53:13.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Density, refractivity, and composition relations of some natural glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

C. E. Tilley*
Affiliation:
Emmanuel College, Cambridge

Extract

Whilst some atention has in the past been devoted to the question of the properties of natural glasses, very little has been done to indicate the interrelations of the properties determined. In the case of tile natural volcanic glasses, this is unfortullately only too evident from a study of the standard text-books. A determination of such properties as density, refractivity, ttud chemical composition, and the interrelations of these for particular glasses, is rarely to be found in the literature. The chief contribution to this subject is due to Stark, who has examined the refringence of a large number of volcanic glasses. Unfortunately, there is no record of the density of these rocks, and the interrelation of these remained unknown.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 275 note 1 Stark, M., Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., 1904, vol. 28, p. 536 Google Scholar.

page 276 note 1 Suess, F. E., Mitt. Geol. Gesell. Wien, 1914, vol. 7, pp. 51121, 3 plsGoogle Scholar.

page 276 note 2 Jezek, B. and Woldrich, J., Bull. Intern. Acad. Sci. Boheme, 1910, vol. 15, pp. 232245 Google Scholar.

page 277 note 1 Larsen, E. S., Amer. Journ. Sci, 1909, vol. 28, pp. 268274 Google Scholar.

page 278 note 1 J. B. Scrivenor (Geol. Mag., 1909, p. 411) has given specific gravity determinations of obsidianites from this locality.

page 280 note 1 Omitting the anomalous Newry pitehstone, the mean becomes 0·2060.

page 281 note 1 Summers, H. S., Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria, 1909, vol. 21, pp. 423443 Google Scholar.

page 285 note 1 Tesch, P., Proc. Sci. K. Akad. Wetens. Amsterdam, 1903, vol. 5, pp. 602605 Google Scholar.

page 285 note 2 Washington, H. S., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1920, vol. 50, p. 449 Google Scholar.

page 287 note 1 Day, A. L. and Shepherd, E. S., Ann. Rep. Smithson. Inst., 1918, p. 286 Google Scholar.

page 287 note 2 Lacroix, A., Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1912, vol. 154, p. 258 Google Scholar.

page 287 note 3 Judd, J. W. and Cole, G. A. J., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 1883, vol. 89, p. 455 Google Scholar.

page 287 note 4 Cole, G. A. J., ibid., 1888, vol. 44, p. 803 Google Scholar.

page 287 note 5 Harker, A., Tertiary Igneous Rocks of Skye, Mem. Geol. Survey, Great Britain, 1904, p. 342 Google Scholar.

page 287 note 6 Harker, A., Geology of the Small Isles, Mere. Geol. Suvvey, Scotland, 1908, p. 157 Google Scholar.

page 288 note 1 Washington, H. S., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1920, vol. 50, p. 458 Google Scholar.

page 288 note 2 Day, A. L. and Shepherd, E. S., Ann. Rep. Smithson. Inst., 1913, p. 286 Google Scholar.

page 289 note 1 The K value for orthoelase using the specific gravity of the St. Gotthard adulsria is 0·2035, in which ease substituted here would reduce these values to 0·2067 and 0·2082 respectively without affecting the values for the basic glasses.

page 290 note 1 H. S. Washington, loc. cit., p. 462.

page 290 note 1 Two slightly different relations to that expressed in equation (6), are derived by C. Pulfrieh (Zeits. phys. Chem., 1889, vol. 4, pp. 561-569), and F. Schutt (Zeits. phys. Chem., 1892, vol. 9, pp. 349-377), in which the specific refractivities are considered as not being strictly additive.

page 290 note 2 Holmes, J., Trans. Chem. Soc., 1915, vol. 107, p. 1471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 290 note 3 Iddings, J. P., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1920, vol. 49, pp. 863366 Google Scholar.