Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:30:42.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Wavelength Spectrometers: Are They Still Needed? ..Or “The More Thing Change, The More They Stay The Same’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Nick Barbi*
Affiliation:
Peak Instruments, Inc.
*
(609)737-8133

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the early 1970's there was often heated debate over the quality of analytical performance attainable with Energy Dispersive (ED) systems using solid state detectors. Many scientists, particularly the more practical ones, were convinced that only WDX was reliable; while those with perhaps more imagination were convinced EDX was the future in microanaiysis. At that time, both groups were right.

EDX has seen remarkable improvement since those early days. At that time ED spectrometers were limited to analysis of elements above atomic number 10, and state-of-the-art resolution was improving to about 155 eV at Mn. Overlaps were handled strictly in quantitative analysis routines and even then only by use of simple overlap factors. Wavelength Dispersive (WD) spectrometers, although slow and difficult to operate, were required for light element analysis, to perform analyses when overlaps were present or suspected, and to detect trace elements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1995