Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:39:01.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solutions to the Problem of Substitution of ERL 4221 for Vinyl Cyclohexene Dioxide in Spurr Low Viscosity Embedding Formulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

E. Ann Ellis
E. Ann Ellis*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
*
[email protected]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Spurr low viscosity embedding medium was introduced in 1969 and used vinyl cyclohexene dioxide (VCD or ERL 4206) as the low viscosity epoxy resin together with nonenyl succinic anhydride (NSA), the flexibilizer DER 736, and the accelerator dimethylaminoethanol (DMAE or S-1). This low viscosity formulation has been used extensively for embedding plant materials, microrganisms and other difficult specimens. Over the years numerous concerns about the toxicity and carcinogenicity of VCD have been raised. VCD (Fig. 1) was finally removed from the market in 2005 and replaced with ERL 4221 (Fig. 2), a cyclic epoxide with a higher molecular weight and higher viscosity. Vendors instructed that ERL 4221 be substituted for VCD at the same rates as used in the original Spurr formulation. This direct substitution resulted in a more viscous resin and blocks were extremely hard and brittle and lacked the sectioning qualities of the original formulation. Vendors then suggested modifications to the dehydration schedule and reductions in the amount of DMAE to improve the quality of the blocks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy Today , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , July 2006 , pp. 32 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2006

References

1. Spurr, A. R., J. Ultrastruct. Res. 26 (1969) 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Aldrich Handbook of Chemicals and Laboratory Equipment. 2000-2001. Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
3. Glauert, A. M. and Lewis, P. R., Chapt. 6 Embedding in epoxy resins in Biological Specimen Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1998.Google Scholar
4. Mollenhauer, H. H., Stain Technol. 39 (1964) 111.Google Scholar
5. Luft, J. H., J. Biophys. Biochem. 9 (1961) 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kushida, H., J. Electron Microsc. 23 (1974) 197.Google Scholar
7. Ellis, E. A., Proc. Microsc. Microanal. 8, suppl. 2 (2002)884 CD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Ellis, E. A., Microscopy Today 11:2 (2003) 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Appreciation is expressed to John Arnott, Ladd Research, Williston, VT, for providing information on the WPE of ERL 4221 before such information was available to the general public.Google Scholar