Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:51:26.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Response to the Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Barry R. J Rittman*
Affiliation:
The University of Texas

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of my previous article was to identify many of the potential sources of error to be considered when evaluating quantitative data from immunohistochemistry (IHC) and histochemical reactions on sections.

Factors that may affect the evaluation of quantitative IHC data were listed but not necessarily placed in their order or importance. This would be difficult to do, as the relative importance of factors may differ for different antigens and histochemical procedures.

As far as can be determined, there appear to be no definitive articles that unequivocally show that IHC reactions are stoichiometric. In most laboratories, it is impractical to accurately determine section thickness, and furthermore many of the image analysis systems used may be somewhat rudimentary. Accurate determination of section thickness may therefore be somewhat of a moot point.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1999