Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:19:51.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preparation of Geological and Biological TEM Specimens by Embedding in Sulfur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Richard C. Hugo*
Affiliation:
Portland State University
Sherry L. Cady
Affiliation:
Portland State University

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The technique of embedding TEM specimens in polymer resins for subsequent ultra-thin sectioning is well established. For geological materials, this protocol prevents specimen damage introduced by ion beam thinning, and is often used for preparing friable or porous materials. However, traditional polymer-based embedding resins may introduce organic carbon contaminants, producing artifacts in carbon analyses. Thus, a carbon-free substitute for traditional embedding media is required to ensure accurate carbon analyses of embedded and ultramicrotomed TEM specimens.

A suitable technique that was first reported by Bradley is to embed specimens in pure sultur. In this technique, the specimen is immersed in liquid sulfur, the liquid is solidified, and the resulting block is ultramicrotomed as with traditional resins. Since sulfur has a high vapor pressure at room temperature, the ultra-thin sections are then placed in a separate vacuum chamber to sublimate the sulfur, yielding TEM specimens free of any embedding medium.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2004

References

1. Bozzola, J.J. and Russell, L.D., Electron microscopy: principles and techniques for biologists. 2nd ed. 1999, Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Rartlett.Google Scholar
2. Bradley, J.P., Keller, L., Thomas, K.L., Vander Wood, T.B., and Brownlee, D.E. (1993). Carbon analyses of IDPs sectioned in sulfur and supported on beryllium films, in Twenty-fourth lunar and planetary science conference, NASA Lunar and Planetary Science Conference.Google Scholar
3. Keller, L.P., Thomas, K.L., and McKay, D.S., Carbon petrography and the chemical state of carbon and nitrogen in IDPs, in Twenty-seventh Lunar and planetary science conterence. 1996, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, p, 659-660.Google Scholar
4. Nakamura, K., Zolensky, M.E.T.S., and Tomeoka, K. (2002). Raman spectroscopy of carbonaceous globules in the Tagish Lake chondrite, in 65th annual meeting of the Meteorilical Society. Meteoritical Society.Google Scholar
5. Hode, T., Kristiansson, p., Hugo, R.C., and Cady, S.L., (2004). A new non-destructive micro -analytical method for stable carbon isotope analysis of TEM-sections, in Third Astrobiology Science Conference. NASA AMES Research Center.Google Scholar
6. Joswiak, D.J. (2003) Private Communication.Google Scholar