Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:31:44.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heated-Tip AFM: Applications in Nanocomposite Polymer Membranes and Energetic Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Jason P. Killgore
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chem. Eng., Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA
William King
Affiliation:
Dept. of Mech. Sci. and Eng, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL
Kevin Kjoller*
Affiliation:
Anasys Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA
René M. Overney
Affiliation:
Dept. of Chem. Eng., Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) is a key technique for the measurement and analysis of samples when nanoscale topography is of interest. It offers a number of complementary probing modes that extend an AFM's measurement capability to a wide range of material and transport properties of surfaces, including hardness, friction, conductivity and adhesion among others. Sample temperature controlled AFM extends the study of surface morphology and properties to include changes in the material phases.

Recently, silicon microfabricated AFM cantilevers that have integrated heaters, as shown in figure 1, have become commercially available. These cantilevers were initially developed for probe based data storage by researchers at IBM Zurich, Figure 1. With the availability of these cantilevers, AFM measurements can be performed where the tip is heated as opposed to the sample.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2007

References

References:

[1] King, W.P., Kenny, T.W., Goodson, K.E., Cross, G.L.W., Despont, M., Dürig, U., Rothuizen, H., Binnig, G., and Vettiger, P., “Atomic Force Microscope Cantilevers for Combined Thermomechanical Data Writing and Reading,” Applied Physics Letters 78, pp. 13001302, 2001.Google Scholar
[2] Masuda, T, Isobe, E, Higashimura, T and Takada, K 1983 Journal of the American Chemical Society 105 7473-4.Google Scholar
[3] Masuda, T, Tang, B Z, Tanaka, A and Higashimura, T 1986 Macromolecules 19 1459-64.Google Scholar
[4] Merkel, T C, Freeman, B D, Spontak, R J, He, Z, Pinnau, I, Meakin, P and Hill, A J 2002 Science 296 519-22.Google Scholar
[5] Merkel, T C, He, Z, Pinnau, I, Freeman, B D, Meakin, P and Hill, A J 2003 Macromolecules 36 6844-55.Google Scholar
[6] De Sitter, K, Winberg, P, D'Haen, J, Dotremont, C, Leysen, R, Martens, J A, Mullens, S, Maurer, F H J and Vankelecom, I F J 2006 Journal of Membrane Science 278 8391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Prabhakar, R S, Merkel, T C, Freeman, B D, Imizu, T and Higuchi, A 2005 Macromolecules 38 1899-910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Andrady, A L, Merkel, T C and Toy, L G 2004 Macromolecules 37 4329-31Google Scholar
[9] Armstrong, R. W. Journal de Physique IV 1995, 5, (c4), 89102.Google Scholar
[10] Dlott, D. D. Materials Science and Technology 2006, 22, (4), 463473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Armstrong, R. W.; Baschung, B.; Booth, D. W.; Samirant, M. Nano Letters 2003, 3, (2), 253255.Google Scholar
[12] King, W. P.; Saxena, S.; Nelson, B. A.; Weeks, B. L.; Pitchimani, R. Nano Letters 2006, 56, 930933.Google Scholar