Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:07:41.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cryoprotectant Tissue Storage Solutions: Stability at Lower Temperatures, Longer Storage Times, More Versatile Usage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Donna M. Simmons*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Infusion with buffer/sucrose solutions (up to 30% sucrose) has long been used to ‘cryoprotect’ tissue in an attempt to prevent ice crystal artifact in frozen sections. This is helpful for example in sectioning large, fixed tissue blocks that must be frozen relatively slowly in dry ice to allow sectioning on a sliding microtome. In 1977, De Olmos added ethylene glycol to the mixture (30 g cane sugar/50 ml 0.1 M PO4 buffer at pH 7.2 in 20 ml ethylene glycoi) for -10°C storage of free floating sections from lightly fixed primate brain. Jones and Kane in 78 used this solution for storage of sections at -20°C (standard household freezer temperature) for up to one month before horseradish peroxidase histochemical reaction, in their methods, they cautioned that "sucrose attracts insects" (ants, personal communication). We and others have found the above cryoprotectant solution generally useful for storage of free floating sections from fixed brain. We observed that adjacent sections stored at 4°C in buffer for 2 weeks (common practice for Nissl stained sections) lost their reactivity to antibody labelling.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2000

References

1. De Olmos, J.S. An improved HRP method for the study of central nervous connections. Exper. Brain Res. 29:541-551, 1977.Google Scholar

2. Kane, J. K. A protocol for horseradish peroxidase (HRP) histochemistry, as practiced in the laboratory of E. G. Jones. In Society for Neuroscience Shortcourse in Neuroanatomical Techniques, 1978.Google Scholar

3. Simmons, D.M., Arriza, J.L and Swanson, L.W., A complete protocol for in situ hybridization of messenger RNAs in brain and other tissues with radiolabeled single-stranded RNA probes, J. Histotech., 12(3):169-181, 1989.Google Scholar

4. Ryanz, A.F., Watts, A.G., and Simmons, D.M.. Preservation of MRNA during in situ hybridization in the cochlea. Hearing Research, 56:148-152, 1991.Google Scholar