Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:04:46.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biomedical Applications: Pitfalls in the Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

J.D. Shelbourne
Affiliation:
Duke University and VA Medical Centers, Durham, NC
Peter Ingram
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC
Victor L. Roggli
Affiliation:
Duke University and VA Medical Centers, Durham, NC
Ann LeFurgey
Affiliation:
Duke University and VA Medical Centers, Durham, NC

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

At present most medical microprobe analysis is conducted on insoluble particulates such as asbestos fibers in lung tissue. Cryotechniques are not necessary for this type of specimen. Insoluble particulates can be processed conventionally Nevertheless, it is important to emphasize that conventional processing is unacceptable for specimens in which electrolyte distributions in tissues are sought. It is necessary to flash-freeze in order to preserve the integrity of electrolyte distributions at the subcellular and cellular level. Ideally, biopsies should be flash-frozen in the operating room rather than being frozen several minutes later in a histology laboratory. Electrolytes will move during such a long delay. While flammable cryogens such as propane obviously cannot be used in an operating room, liquid nitrogen-cooled slam-freezing devices or guns may be permitted, and are the best way to achieve an artifact-free, accurate tissue sample which truly reflects the in vivo state. Unfortunately, the importance of cryofixation is often not understood.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1994

References

1. Ingram, P. et al., Microprobe Analysis in Medicine, Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation (1989).Google Scholar
2. Roggli, V.L., in Bailey, G.W., Ed., Proc. EMSA, San Francisco: San Francisco Press (1988) 84.Google Scholar
3. Roggli, V.L. and Shelburne, J.D., in Dail, D.H. and Hammar, S.P., Eds., Pulmonary Pathology, 2nd ed., New York: Springer-Verlag (1994) 86 Google Scholar