Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T18:34:02.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What X-Ray Microanalysis Can Tell Us About The Regulation of Intracellular Calcium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

S.B. Andrews
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Neurobiology, NINDS, Bethesda, MD, 20892-4062
N.B. Pivovarova
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Neurobiology, NINDS, Bethesda, MD, 20892-4062
L.D. Pozzo-Miller
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Neurobiology, NINDS, Bethesda, MD, 20892-4062
R.D. Leapman
Affiliation:
Biomédical Engineering 3x0026 Instrumentation Program, NCRR, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-4062.
Get access

Extract

Many cell functions, including such critical processes as secretion, neuronal communication, muscle contraction, and even gene expression, are regulated by spatial and temporal changes in the intracellular concentration of Ca2+ ions. The high spatial resolution and analytical sensitivity of energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) microanalysis are ideally suited to characterizing biologically relevant changes in total concentration of cellular Ca. However, EDX results have not yet had a wide impact in the field of Ca regulation, with most laboratories preferring to focus on optically measured changes in free Ca concentrations as the important determinant of biological activity. This paper advocates a more positive perspective for the role of EDX microanalysis in studies of Ca regulation.

It is well known that the large majority of cellular Ca is in the bound form, with typical bound/free ratios on the order of l03-104 5. However, the most dramatic changes during Ca2+ -dependent cell activation occur as transients in the free Ca2+ pool.

Type
Quantitative Biological and Materials Microanalysis by Electrons and X-Rays
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Somlyo, A.P., Cell Calcium 6 (1985)197.10.1016/0143-4160(85)90044-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeFurgey, A. and Ingram, P., Environ. Health Persped. 84 (1990)57.10.1289/ehp.908457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R.J., Prog. Neurobiol. 37 (1991)255.10.1016/0301-0082(91)90028-YCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozzan, T.et al., Physiol. Rev. 74 (1994)595.10.1152/physrev.1994.74.3.595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBurney, R.N. and Neering, I.R., Trends Neurosci. 10 (1987)164.10.1016/0166-2236(87)90042-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somlyo, A.P.et al., Nature 314 (1985)622.10.1038/314622a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, S.B.et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sei. USA 85 (1988)1682.10.1073/pnas.85.5.1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, O.et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sei. USA 88 (1991)741.10.1073/pnas.88.3.741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrington, J.et al., Neuron 16 (1996)219.10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80038-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar