Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:29:43.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three-Dimensional Measurement of Line Edge Roughness in Copper Wires Using Electron Tomography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Peter Ercius ,
Lynne M. Gignac ,
C.-K. Hu  and
David A. Muller
Peter Ercius*
Affiliation:
School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Lynne M. Gignac
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
C.-K. Hu
Affiliation:
IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA
David A. Muller
Affiliation:
School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Electrical interconnects in integrated circuits have shrunk to sizes in the range of 20–100 nm. Accurate measurements of the dimensions of these nanowires are essential for identifying the dominant electron scattering mechanisms affecting wire resistivity as they continue to shrink. We report a systematic study of the effect of line edge roughness on the apparent cross-sectional area of 90 nm Cu wires with a TaN/Ta barrier measured by conventional two-dimensional projection imaging and three-dimensional electron tomography. Discrepancies in area measurements due to the overlap of defects along the wire's length lead to a 5% difference in the resistivities predicted by the two methods. Tomography of thick cross sections is shown to give a more accurate representation of the original structure and allows more efficient sampling of the wire's cross-sectional area. The effect of roughness on measurements from projection images is minimized for cross-section thicknesses less than 50 nm, or approximately half the spatial frequency of the roughness variations along the length of the investigated wires.

Keywords

electron tomographySTEMelectron microscopythree-dimensionalsemiconductor devicesresistivityline edge roughnessprojection measurementscopper wireintegrated circuit
Type
Materials Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 244 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bals, S., Kisielowski, C., Croitoru, M. & Tendeloo, G.V. (2005). Tomography using annular dark field imaging in TEM. Microsc Microanal 11, 2118–2119.Google Scholar
Bals, S., Tirry, W., Geurts, R., Yang, Z. & Schryvers, D. (2007). High-quality sample preparation by low kV FIB thinning for analytical TEM measurements. Microsc Microanal 13(2), 80–86.Google Scholar
Besling, W.F.A., Broekaart, M., Arnal, V. & Torres, J. (2004). Line resistance behaviour in narrow lines patterned by a TiN hard mask spacer for 45 nm node interconnects. Microelectron Eng 76, 167–174.Google Scholar
Cha, J.J., Weyland, M., Briere, J.-F., Daykov, I.P., Arias, T.A. & Muller, D.A. (2007). Three-dimensional imaging of carbon nanotubes deformed by metal islands. Nano Lett 7(12), 3770–3773.Google Scholar
Ercius, P., Weyland, M., Muller, D.A. & Gignac, L.M. (2006). Three-dimensional imaging of nanovoids in copper interconnects using incoherent bright field tomography. Appl Phys Lett 88, 243116.Google Scholar
Gignac, L.M., Hu, C.-K., Herbst, B.W. & Baker-O'Neal, B.C. (2007). The effect of microstructure on resistivity and reliability in copper interconnects. In Advanced Metallization Conference 2007, McKerrow, A.J., Shacham-Diamand, Y., Shingubara, S. & Shimogaki, Y. (Eds.). Berkeley, CA: Materials Research Society.Google Scholar
Gilbert, P. (1972). Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object for projections. J Theor Biol 36(1), 105–117.Google Scholar
Hawkes, P.W. (1992). The electron microscope as a structure projector. In Electron Tomography: Three-Dimensional Imaging with the Transmission Electron Microscope, Frank, J. (Ed.), pp. 17–38. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Hinode, K., Hanaoka, Y., Takeda, K.-I. & Kondo, S. (2001). Resistivity increase in ultrafine-line copper conductor for ULSIs. Jpn J Appl Phys 40(10B), L1097–L1099.Google Scholar
Jinnai, H., Nishikawa, Y., Spontak, R.J., Smith, S.D., Agard, D.A. & Hashimoto, T. (2000). Direct measurement of interfacial curvature distributions in a bicontinuous block copolymer morphology. Phys Rev Lett 84(3), 518.Google Scholar
Kawase, N., Kato, M., Nishioka, H. & Jinnai, H. (2007). Transmission electron microtomography without the “missing wedge” for quantitative structural analysis. Ultramicroscopy 107(1), 8–15.Google Scholar
Kim, C.-U., Park, J., Michael, N., Gillespie, P. & Augur, R. (2003). Study of electron-scattering mechanism in nanoscale Cu interconnects. J Elect Mater 32(10), 982–987.Google Scholar
Kim, H.S., Hwang, S.O., Myung, Y., Park, J., Bae, S.Y. & Ahn, J.P. (2008). Three-dimensional structure of helical and zigzagged nanowires using electron tomography. Nano Lett 8(2), 551–557.Google Scholar
Kirkland, E.J. (1998). Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Kirkland, E.J., Loane, R.F. & Silcox, J. (1987). Simulation of annular dark field STEM images using a modified multislice method. Ultramicroscopy 23, 77–96.Google Scholar
Koster, A.J., Ziese, U., Verkleij, A.J., Janssen, A.H. & de Jong, K.P. (2000). Three-dimensional electron microscopy: A novel imaging and characterization technique with nanometer scale resolution for materials science. J Phys Chem B 104, 9368–9370.Google Scholar
Leunissen, L.H.A., Zhang, W., Wu, W. & Brongersma, S.H. (2006). Impact of line edge roughness on copper interconnects. J Vac Sci Technol B 24(4), 1859–1862.Google Scholar
Marom, H., Mullin, J. & Eizenberg, M. (2006). Size-dependent resistivity of nanometric copper wires. Phys Rev B 74, 045411.Google Scholar
Midgley, P.A. & Weyland, M. (2003). 3D electron microscopy in the physical sciences: The development of Z-contrast and EFTEM tomography. Ultramicroscopy 96, 413–431.Google Scholar
Misell, D.L. (1977). Conventional and scanning transmission electron microscopy: Image contrast and radiation damage. J Phys D Appl Phys 10(8), 1085–1107.Google Scholar
Muller, D.A. & Silcox, J. (1995). Radiation damage of Ni3Al by 100 keV electrons. Philos Mag A 71(6), 1375–1387.Google Scholar
Murarka, S.P., Verner, I.V. & Gutman, R.J. (2000). Copper-Fundamental Mechanisms for Microelectronic Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Plombon, J.J., Andideh, E., Dubin, V.M. & Maiz, J. (2006). Influence of phonon, geometry, impurity, and grain size on copper line resistivity. Appl Phys Lett 89, 113124.Google Scholar
Steinhogl, W., Schindler, G., Steinlesberger, G. & Engelhardt, M. (2002). Size-dependent resistivity of metallic wires in the mesoscopic range. Phys Rev B 66, 075414.Google Scholar
Steinhogl, W., Schindler, G., Traving, M. & Engelhardt, M. (2004). Impact of line edge roughness on the resistivity of nanometer-scale interconnects. Microelectron Eng 76, 126–130.Google Scholar
Toombes, G.E.S., Mahajan, S., Weyland, M., Jain, A., Du, P., Kamperman, M., Gruner, S.M., Muller, D.A. & Wiesner, U. (2008). Self-assembly of four-layer woodpile structure from zigzag ABC copolymer/aluminosilicate concertinas. Macromolecules 41(3), 852–859.Google Scholar
Verheijen, M.A., Algra, R.E., Borgstrom, M.T., Immink, G., Sourty, E., van Enckevort, W.J.P., Vlieg, E. & Bakkers, E.P.A.M. (2007). Three-dimensional morphology of GaP-GaAs nanowires revealed by transmission electron microscopy tomography. Nano Lett 7(10), 3051–3055.Google Scholar
Weyland, M. (2001). Two and three dimensional nanoscale analysis: New techniques and applications. Ph.D Thesis. Cambridge, UK: Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Wu, W., Brongersma, S.H., Hove, M.V. & Maex, K. (2004). Influence of surface and grain-boundary scattering on the resistivity of copper in reduced dimensions. Appl Phys Lett 84, 2838.Google Scholar
Zhang, H.B., Zhang, X.L., Wang, Y. & Takaoka, A. (2007a). Tomography experiment of an integrated circuit specimen using 3 MeV electrons in the transmission electron microscope. Rev Sci Instrum 78, 013701.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Brongersma, S.H., Li, Z., Li, D., Richard, O. & Maex, K. (2007b). Analysis of the size effect in electroplated fine copper wires and a realistic assessment to model copper resistivity. J App Phys 101, 063703.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2007). Surface effects in the energy loss near edge structure of different cobalt oxides. Ultramicroscopy 107, 598–693.Google Scholar