Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T14:38:09.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TEM Microscopical Examination of the Stepped Bainite Reaction in Silicon Steels.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

G. Fourlaris
Affiliation:
School of Materials, The University of Leeds, LeedsLS2 9JT, U.K.
G. Papadimitriou
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Athens, Laboratory of Physical Metallurgy, 15780Athens, GR.
Get access

Extract

The bainitic reaction in steels has been extensively studied, however it is still controversial whether it proceeds by a diffusional or a shear mechanism. In a previous investigation of the bainite reaction in a Fe-3.9Si-0.9C steel the transformation was considered to be the result of two competing elementary mechanisms, i.e., the shear transformation of the α-iron lattice and the diffusion of interstitial carbon away from the transformation interface.

In this paper, the microstructural and crystallographic characteristics of the bainite products obtained through the step quenching experiments are examined, using TEM and Electron diffraction. The results are compared to those obtained by the corresponding bainitic transformation in a single step. The results obtained here support the proposed model in and the shear character of the bainitic transformation.

The same steel as in, an alloy with 3.9 w.t.% silicon and 0.9 w.t.% carbon, was used. After austenitizing at 1130°C for 30 minutes a number of samples were transformed at 420°C for 30 minutes and subsequently quenched in a second bath where they were kept for times increasing from one to thirty days at temperatures of either 360,340 or 290°C.

Type
Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Aaronson, H.Iet al., Metallurgical Transactions A, 21A(1990), 1343.10.1007/BF02672557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H and Edmonds, D.V., Acta Metallurgica, 28(1980), 1265.10.1016/0001-6160(80)90082-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sandvik, B.P.J., Metallurgical Transactions A, 13A(1982), 777.10.1007/BF02642391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Papadimitriou, G. and Genin, J.M., Proc. Inter. Conf. Marten. Transf., (1986), Jap. Inst. Met., 607.Google Scholar
5.Papadimitriou, G., Courrier, R. and Genin”, J.M., C.R. Acad.Sc.Paris, 276C(1973), 739.Google Scholar
6.Papadimitriou, G and Fourlaris, G., Proceedings ESOMAT ’97, in press.Google Scholar