Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:30:10.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Stem Study Of A Germanium Island-Silicon Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

R.R. Vanfleet
Affiliation:
School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853
D.P. Basile
Affiliation:
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA94303
T.I. Kamins
Affiliation:
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA94303
J. Silcox
Affiliation:
School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853
R. Stanley Williams
Affiliation:
Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA94303
Get access

Extract

Growth of germanium or silicon-germanium on silicon 100 surfaces produces pyramid shaped islands after several monolayers of coverage. With further deposition, these islands will continue to grow until they reach a critical volume where a transition to a dome shape occurs. The critical surface coverage for island formation and the critical volume for the pyramid to dome transition depend upon the silicon to germanium ratio or degree of mismatch between the deposited material and the silicon substrate. Strain plays a dominant role in the shape transitions. Annealing studies have shown that the pyramid to dome transition.is reversible and is likely due to strain reduction related to interdiffusion. Annealing results in island growth, a decrease in the number of islands, and interdiffusion of the silicon and germanium. The interdiffusion relieves the strain and shifts the critical volume to a value exceeding the current volume of the dome shaped island thereby driving the transition back to pyramidal shape.

Type
Atomic Structure And Microchemistry Of Interfaces
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Eaglesham, D.J. and Cerullo, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64(1990)1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Mo, Y.W. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65(1990)1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Krishnamurthy, M. et al. J. Appl. Phys. 69(1991)6461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Medeiros-Ribeiro, G., et al, Science, 279(1998)353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Dorsch, W. et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(1998)179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Tersoff, J., and LeGuoes, F.K., Phys. Rev Lett. 72(1994)3570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Floro, J.A. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(1997)3946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Kamins, T.I. et al. Appl. Phys. A 67(1998)1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Perovic, D.D. et al. Ultramicroscopy 52(1993)353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10This research was supported by the Semiconductor Research Corporation under contract number 98-SC-419 and Hewlett-Packard Laboratories.Google Scholar