Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:50:35.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and NFKB p65 in the Lupus Kidney

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

M. Nishikawa
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, 162-8666
R. Igarashi
Affiliation:
Institute of Medical Science, St Marianna University, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, 216-8511, Japan
T. Nakazawa
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, 162-8666
E. Aikawa
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, 162-8666
Get access

Extract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important role in lupus nephritis. It has been known that nuclear factor kB(NFkB) is activated by ROS, and binds to KB element in nucleus. Afterwards, inflammatory cytokines are translated and produced in lymphocytes, macrophages and glomerular cells in the kidney. In this study, we investigated the role of ROS and NFkB p65 in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis (MRL lpr/lpr mice) by the histochemical and immuno-electron microscopic methods.

A modified Brigg’s method was used to determine the generation of H2O2 in the renal tissue of lupus mice. Tissue samples were incubate in 0.1 MTris maleate buffer (pH 7.4) with 7% sucrose, 1mM CeCl3 and 10 mM aminotriazole at 37 °C for 30 min. After completion of the cytochemical reaction, tissues were fixed in 2% w/v glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) at 4 °C for 60 min.

Type
Biological Specimen Preparation/Cytochemistry/ Immunolabeling/Immunocytochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1)Imbert, V. et al., Cell 86 (1996) 787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2)Nishikawa, M. et al., Laboratory Animal Science 49 (1999) 560Google Scholar
3)Ohno, Y. etal., Blood 60 (1982) 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar