Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:29:14.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Microfilaments in Early Meiotic Maturation of Mouse Oocytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2005

Patricia G. Calarco
Patricia G. Calarco
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department, Box 0452, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
Get access

Abstract

Mouse oocyte microfilaments (MF) were perturbed by depolymerization (cytochalasin B) or stabilization (jasplakinolide) and correlated meiotic defects examined by confocal microscopy. MF, microtubules, and mitochondria were vitally stained; centrosomes (γ-tubulin), after fixation. MF depolymerization by cytochalasin in culture medium did not affect central migration of centrosomes, mitochondria, or nuclear breakdown (GVBD); some MF signal was localized around the germinal vesicle (GV). In maturation-blocking medium (containing IBMX), central movement was curtailed and cortical MF aggregations made the plasma membrane wavy. Occasional long MF suggested that not all MF were depolymerized. MF stabilization by jasplakinolide led to MF aggregations throughout the cytoplasm. GVBD occurred (unless IBMX was present) but no spindle formed. Over time, most oocytes constricted creating a dumbbell shape with MF concentrated under one-half of the oocyte cortex and on either side of the constriction. In IBMX medium, the MF-containing half of the dumbbell over time sequestered the GV, MF, mitochondria, and one to two large cortical centrosomes; the non-MF half appeared empty. Cumulus processes contacted the oocyte surface (detected by microtubule content) and mirrored MF distribution. Results demonstrated that MF play an essential role in meiosis, primarily through cortically mediated events, including centrosome localization, spindle (or GV) movement to the periphery, activation of (polar body) constriction, and establishment of oocyte polarity. The presence of a cortical “organizing pole” is hypothesized.

Keywords

meiosisjasplakinolidecentrosomesmicrofilamentspolaritycumulus
Type
BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 146 - 153
Copyright
© 2005 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Becker, B., Romney, S., & Gard, D. (2003). XMAP215, XKCM1, NuMA, and cytoplasmic dynein are required for the assembly and organization of the transient microtubule array during the maturation of Xenopus oocytes. Dev Biol 261, 488–505.Google Scholar
Biggers, J., Whitten, W.K., & Whittingham, D.C. (1971). The culture of mouse embryos in vitro. In Methods in Mammalian Embryology, Daniel, J. (Ed.), pp. 86–116. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Bornslaeger, E.A., Mattei, P., & Schultz, R. (1986). Involvement of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and protein phosphorylation in regulation of mouse oocyte maturation. Dev Biol 114, 453–462.Google Scholar
Bubb, M., Spector, I., Beyer, B., & Fosen, K. (2000). Effects of jasplakinolide on the kinetics of actin polymerization. An explanation for certain in vivo observations. J Biol Chem 18, 5163–5170.Google Scholar
Calarco, P. (1995). Polarization of mitochondria in the unfertilized mouse oocyte. Dev Genet 16, 36–43.Google Scholar
Calarco, P. (1997). Microtubule organizing centers are anchored to the cortex prior to oocyte meiotic maturation. Microsc Microanal 3, 237–238.Google Scholar
Calarco, P. (1998). Gamma tubulin is localized to a new organelle, the multivesicular aggregate, in mammalian oocytes. Microsc Microanal 4, 1124–1125.Google Scholar
Calarco, P. (2000a). Centrosome precursors in the acentriolar mouse oocyte. Micros Res & Tech 49, 428–434.Google Scholar
Calarco, P. (2000b). Immunoprobe localization by correlative microscopy. Microsc Microanal 6, 195–201.Google Scholar
Calarco, P., Siebert, M., Hubble, R., Mitchison, T., & Kirschner, M. (1983). Centrosome development in early mouse embryos as defined by an autoantibody against pericentriolar material. Cell 35, 621–629.Google Scholar
Eppig, J. (1991). Intercommunication between mammalian oocytes and companion somatic cells. BioEssays 13, 569–574.Google Scholar
Fleming, T., Hay, M., Javed, Q., & Citi, S. (1993). Localisation of tight junction protein cingulin is temporally and spatially regulated during early mouse development. Development 117, 1135–1144.Google Scholar
Longo, F. & Chen, D. (1985). Development of cortical polarity in mouse eggs: Involvement of the meiotic apparatus. Dev Biol 107, 382–394.Google Scholar
Oakley, B., Oakley, C., Yoon, Y., & Jung, M. (1990). Gamma-tubulin is a component of the spindle pole body that is essential for microtubule function in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell 61, 1289–1301.Google Scholar
Schatten, H., Cheney, R., Balczon, R., & Willard, M. (1986). Localization of fodrin during fertilization and early development of sea urchin and mice. Dev Biol 118, 457–466.Google Scholar
Spindle, A. (1980). An improved culture medium for mouse blastocysts. In Vitro 16, 669–674.Google Scholar
Sutherland, A.E. & Calarco, P. (1983). Analysis of compaction in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Dev Biol 100, 328–338.Google Scholar
Terada, Y., Simerly, C., & Schatten, G. (2000). Microfilament stabilization by jasplakinolide arrests oocyte maturation, cortical granule exocytosis, sperm incorporation cone resorption, and cell-cycle progression, but not DNA replication, during fertilization in mice. Mol Reprod Dev 56, 89–98.Google Scholar
Van Blerkom, J. (1991). Microtubule mediation of cytoplasmic and nuclear maturation during the early stages of resumed meiosis in cultured mouse oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88, 5031–5035.Google Scholar