Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T02:16:46.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative Visible-Light and Electron Phase Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

A. Barty
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Victoria, Australia
K.A. Nugent
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Victoria, Australia
D. Paganin
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Victoria, Australia
A Roberts
Affiliation:
School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Victoria, Australia
Get access

Extract

At the University of Melbourne we have been pursuing an ongoing program of investigation into the recovery of phase information from intensity measurements [1-9]. In this paper we consider the implications of this work in optical and electron microscopy.

Many objects of interest to biologists are phase objects which means that light is slowed and refracted in the object but not absorbed. Techniques such as phase-contrast microscopy and Nomarski differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy are traditionally used to render the phase structure visible but do not directly map the phase distribution and are unable to produce quantitative data. These techniques also entangle the phase and amplitude information and so have limitations where both phase and amplitude information is required. In this paper, we demonstrate quantitative non-interferometric recovery of microscopic phase structure using incoherent illumination of the type commonly found in optical microscopes, and show that our results correlate with structure observed using Nomarski DIC techniques.

Type
Advances in Instrumentation and Performance
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Paganin, D. and Nugent, K A, Physical Review Letters, in press.Google Scholar
2.Nugent, K.A., Phys.Rev.Letts, 68, 22612264 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gureyev, T.E., Roberts, A. and Nugent, K.A., J.Opt.Soc.Am.A., 12, 19321941 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Gureyev, T.E., Roberts, A. and Nugent, K.A.. J.Opt.Soc.Am.A., 12, 19421946 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Nugent, K.A., Opt.Commun., 118, 913 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Gureyev, T.E. and Nugent, K.A., J.Opt.Soc.Am.A., 13, 16701682 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Nugent, KA et al, Phys. Rev. Letts, 77, 29612964 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Gureyev, T.E. and Nugent, K.A., Opt. Commun, 133, 339346 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Barty, A. et al, Optics Letters, SubmittedGoogle Scholar