Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:27:49.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative Study Of MgO (110) Surface Faceting Angles by AFM and SEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

D. R. Giese
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, MilwaukeeWI53211
F. J. Lamelas
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Marquette University, MilwaukeeWI53233
H. A. Owen
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI53211
M. Gajdardziska-Josifovska
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, MilwaukeeWI53211
Get access

Extract

The stability of polar and neutral MgO surfaces has been addressed by theory and experiment as an ideal example of ionic oxides with rock-salt structure, but with unresolved controversial results. For example, energy-minimization theory predicted that higher energy polar MgO (111) and neutral MgO (110) surfaces could thermally facet into the lowest energy MgO (100) planes. Early low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) experiments reported diffraction spot splitting, interpreted as evidence for thermal faceting to ﹛100﹜ planes. However, a recent study found MgO (111) faceting was caused by chemical etching with nitric or phosphoric acid, and not promoted by annealing. Quantitative atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurement of the facet angles revealed them to be vicinal planes rather than the predicted ﹛100﹜ planes. A recent AFM study reported thermal faceting of MgO (110) into vicinal planes.

Type
Scanned Probe Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Henrich, V. E. and Cox, P. A.. The Surface Science of Metal Oxides. Cambridge University Press, (1994) 29.Google Scholar
2.Henrich, V. E., Surf. Sci., 57 (1976) 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Plass, R., Feller, J. and Gajdardziska-Josifovska, M., Surf Sci., 414 (1998) 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Chern, G., Huang, J. J. and Leung, T. C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 16 (1998) 964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Giese, D. R. et al., Surf. Sci., submitted.Google Scholar
6. Supported under NSF/DMR-9553148 and Research Corporation CC4194.Google Scholar