Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:31:03.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantification Problems in Depth Profiling of PWR Steels Using Ar+ Ion Sputtering and XPS Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2006

Velislava A. Ignatova ,
Sven Van Den Berghe ,
Steven Van Dyck  and
Vladimir N. Popok
Velislava A. Ignatova
Affiliation:
SCK.CEN Reactor Materials Research (LHMA), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium Velislava Ignatova is now at the Fraunhofer Center for Nanotechnologies, Koenigsbruecker Strasse 180, 01099 Dresden, Germany
Sven Van Den Berghe
Affiliation:
SCK.CEN Reactor Materials Research (LHMA), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Steven Van Dyck
Affiliation:
SCK.CEN Reactor Materials Research (LHMA), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
Vladimir N. Popok
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Gothenburg University, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

The oxide scales of AISI 304 formed in boric acid solutions at 300°C and pH = 4.5 have been studied using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) depth profiling. The present focus is depth profile quantification both in depth and chemical composition on a molecular level. The roughness of the samples is studied by atomic force microscopy before and after sputtering, and the erosion rate is determined by measuring the crater depth with a surface profilometer and vertical scanning interferometry. The resulting roughness (20–30 nm), being an order of magnitude lower than the crater depth (0.2–0.5 μm), allows layer-by-layer profiling, although the ion-induced effects result in an uncertainty of the depth calibration of a factor of 2. The XPS spectrum deconvolution and data evaluation applying target factor analysis allows chemical speciation on a molecular level. The elemental distribution as a function of the sputtering time is obtained, and the formation of two layers is observed—one hydroxide (mainly iron–nickel based) on top and a second one deeper, mainly consisting of iron–chromium oxides.

Keywords

PWR steelsXPS depth profilingXPS quantificationerosion rate calibration
Type
MICROANALYSIS
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 12 , Issue 5 , October 2006 , pp. 432 - 437
Copyright
© 2006 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Castle, J.E. & Hazell, L.B. (1977). A nomographic method for identification of interface position in ion-etch profiles. J Electron Spectr Rel Phen 12, 195–202.Google Scholar
Choi, Y.-S., Shim, J.-J., & Kim, J.-G. (2004). Corrosion behavior of low alloy steels containing Cr, Co and W in synthetic potable water. Mat Sci Eng A 385, 148–156.Google Scholar
Keller, P. & Strehblow, H.-H. (2004). XPS investigations of electrochemically formed passive layers on Fe/Cr-alloys in 0.5 M H2SO4. Corr Sci 46, 1939–1952.Google Scholar
Wallinder, D., Pan, J., Leygraf, C., & Delblanc-Bauer, A. (1999). EIS and XPS study of surface modification of 316LVM stainless steel after passivation. Corr Sci 41, 275–289.Google Scholar
Ziemniak, S.E. & Hanson, M. (2002). Corrosion behavior of 304 stainless steel in high temperature, hydrogenated water. Corr Sci 44, 2209–2230.Google Scholar
Ziemniak, S.E. & Hanson, M. (2003). Corrosion behavior of NiCrMo Alloy 625 in high temperature, hydrogenated water. Corr Sci 45, 1595–1618.Google Scholar