Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T09:35:47.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulmonary Neuroepithelial Bodies in Neonatal Rats Chronically Exposed to Nitric Oxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Kuen-Shan Hung
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS66160-7400
Xay K. Her
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS66160-7400
Get access

Extract

Pulmonary neuroepithelial bodies (NEBs) consist of clusters of innervated endocrine cells localized in human and animal lungs. They are prominent in late fetal and neonatal lungs and their density declines with increased postnatal age. Gas sensing functions of these structures have been suggested by Lauweryns and Cokelaere. Subsequent experiments show that chronic hypoxia leads to an increase in the size or number of NEBs, and prolonged hyperoxia also causes elevation of NEB numbers. Animals exposed to cigarette smoke also had an increased number of immunoreactive NEBs.

Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) can reverse pulmonary vasoconstriction induced by hypoxic breathing or ligation of ductus arteriosus in newborn and young animals. These studies led to clinical use of NO for treatment of pediatric patients with pulmonary hypertension. However, direct effects of inhaled NO on various components of the lung are not clearly understood.

Type
Biological Structure (Cells, Tissues, Organ Systems)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Cho, T. et al., Cell Tissue Res. 255 (1989): 353362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Frostell, C. et al., Circulation 83 (1991): 20382047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lauweryns, J. M. and Cokelaere, M., 145 (1973): 521–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Montuenga, L. M. et al., Cell Tissue Res. 268 (1992): 915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Pack, R. J. et al., Eur. J. Respir. Dis. 68 (1986): 121130Google Scholar
6.Redick, M. L. and Hung, K.-S., Cell Tissue Res. 38 (1984): 583587Google Scholar
7.Roberts, J.D. et al., Circ. Res. 72 (1993): 246254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Shenberger, J. S. et al., Pediatr. Res. 42 (1997): 539544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Stark, A. R. and Davidson, D., Pediatrics 96 (1995): 11471151Google Scholar
10.Steudel, W. et al., Anesthesiology 91 (1999): 10901121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Van Lommel, A. and Lauweryns, J.M.: J. Auto. Nerv. Syst. 65 (1997): 1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Tobassian, A. R. et al., Am. Rev. Respir. Dis 140 (1989): 436440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Zayak, M. et al., J.|Pediatr. 122 (1993):743750CrossRefGoogle Scholar