Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:44:54.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Precise Drift Tracking for In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy via a Thon-Ring Based Sample Position Measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2022

Fan Zhang ,
Xiaoben Zhang ,
Zhenghao Jia  and
Wei Liu Open the ORCID record for Wei Liu [Opens in a new window]
Fan Zhang
Affiliation:
Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, Liaoning 116023, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
Xiaoben Zhang
Affiliation:
Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, Liaoning 116023, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
Zhenghao Jia
Affiliation:
Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, Liaoning 116023, China
Wei Liu*
Affiliation:
Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, Liaoning 116023, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
*
*Corresponding author: Wei Liu, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Visualizing how a catalyst behaves during chemical reactions using in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is crucial for understanding the activity origin and guiding performance optimization. However, the sample drifts as temperature changes during in situ reaction, which weakens the resolution and stability of TEM imaging, blocks insights into the dynamic details of catalytic reaction. Herein, a Thon-ring based sample position measurement (TSPM) was developed to track the sample height variation during in situ TEM observation. Drifting characteristics for three commercially available nanochips were studied, showing large biases in aspects of shifting modes, expansion heights, as well as the thermal conduction hysteresis during rapid heating. Particularly, utilizing the TSPM method, for the first time, the gas layer thickness inside a gas-cell nanoreactor was precisely determined, which varies with reaction temperature and gas pressure in a linear manner with coefficients of ~8 nm/°C and ~50 nm/mbar, respectively. Following drift prediction of TSPM, fast oxidation kinetics of a Ni particle was tracked in real time for 12 s at 500°C. This TSPM method is expected to facilitate the functionality of automatic target tracing for in situ microscopy applications when feedback to hardware control of the microscope.

Keywords

contrast transfer functiongas layer thicknessin situ TEMsample height drift
Type
Software and Instrumentation
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , December 2022 , pp. 1945 - 1951
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beermann, V, Holtz, ME, Padgett, E, de Araujo, JF, Muller, DA & Strasser, P (2019). Real-time imaging of activation and degradation of carbon supported octahedral Pt-Ni alloy fuel cell catalysts at the nanoscale using in situ electrochemical liquid cell STEM. Energy Environ Sci 12, 2476–2485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyes, ED & Gai, PL (1997). Environmental high resolution electron microscopy and applications to chemical science. Ultramicroscopy 67, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creemer, JF, Helveg, S, Hoveling, GH, Ullmann, S, Molenbroek, AM, Sarro, PM & Zandbergen, HW (2008). Atomic-scale electron microscopy at ambient pressure. Ultramicroscopy 108, 993–998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garza, HHP, Morsink, D, Xu, J, Sholkina, M, Pivak, Y, Pen, MJ, van Weperen, S & Xu, Q (2017). MEMS-based nanoreactor for in situ analysis of solid-gas interactions inside the transmission electron microscope. Micro Nano Lett 12, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalz, KF, Kraehnert, R, Dvoyashkin, M, Dittmeyer, R, Glaser, R, Krewer, U, Reuter, K & Grunwaldt, JD (2017). Future challenges in heterogeneous catalysis: Understanding catalysts under dynamic reaction conditions. ChemCatChem 9, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohler, H (1981). On abbes theory of image-formation in the microscope. Opt Acta 28, 1691–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, LC & Corma, A (2021). Identification of the active sites in supported subnanometric metal catalysts. Nat Catal 4, 453–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y, Yin, W-J, Peng, K-L, Wang, K, Hu, Q, Selloni, A, Chen, F-R, Liu, L-M & Sui, M-L (2018). Self-hydrogenated shell promoting photocatalytic H2 evolution on anatase TiO2. Nat Commun 9, 2752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mele, L, Konings, S, Dona, P, Evertz, F, Mitterbauer, C, Faber, P, Schampers, R & Jinschek, JR (2016). A MEMS-based heating holder for the direct imaging of simultaneous in-situ heating and biasing experiments in scanning/transmission electron microscopes. Microsc Res Tech 79, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Omme, JT, Zakhozheva, M, Spruit, RG, Sholkina, M & Garza, HHP (2018). Advanced microheater for in situ transmission electron microscopy; Enabling unexplored analytical studies and extreme spatial stability. Ultramicroscopy 192, 14–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yilmaz, A, Javed, O & Shah, M (2006). Object tracking: A survey. ACM Comput Surv 38, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, J, Yuan, WT, Yang, HS, Xu, Q, Wang, Y & Zhang, Z (2018). Fast gas-solid reaction kinetics of nanoparticles unveiled by millisecond in situ electron diffraction at ambient pressure. Angew Chem Int Ed 57, 11344–11348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, W, Zhu, B, Li, X-Y, Hansen, TW, Ou, Y, Fang, K, Yang, H, Zhang, Z, Wagner, JB, Gao, Y & Wang, Y (2020). Visualizing H2O molecules reacting at TiO2 active sites with transmission electron microscopy. Science 367, 428–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, WT, Zhang, DW, Ou, Y, Fang, K, Zhu, BE, Yang, HS, Hansen, TW, Wagner, JB, Zhang, Z, Gao, Y & Wang, Y (2018). Direct in situ TEM visualization and insight into the facet-dependent sintering behaviors of gold on TiO2. Angew Chem Int Ed 57, 16827–16831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M, Olson, EA, Twesten, RD, Wen, JG, Allen, LH, Robertson, IM & Petrov, I (2005). In situ transmission electron microscopy studies enabled by microelectromechanical system technology. J Mater Res 20, 1802–1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, XB, Han, SB, Zhu, BE, Zhang, GH, Li, XY, Gao, Y, Wu, ZX, Yang, B, Liu, YF, Baaziz, W, Ersen, O, Gu, M, Miller, JT & Liu, W (2020). Reversible loss of core-shell structure for Ni-Au bimetallic nanoparticles during CO2 hydrogenation. Nat Catal 3, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material 1

Download Zhang et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 20.2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material 2

Download Zhang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.7 MB