Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:57:25.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nondestructive Characterization and Enzyme Cleaning of Painted Surfaces: Assessment from the Macro to Nano Level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2013

Catarina Pereira ,
Tito Busani ,
Luis C. Branco ,
Ineke Joosten  and
Irina Crina Anca Sandu
Catarina Pereira
Affiliation:
Department of Conservation and Restoration (DCR), Faculty of Sciences and Technology (FCT), Nova University of Lisbon (UNL), Campus Monte de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
Tito Busani*
Affiliation:
CENIMAT/I3N, Department of Material Science, Faculty of Sciences and Technology (FCT), Nova University of Lisbon (UNL), and CEMOP-UNINOVA, Campus Monte de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
Luis C. Branco
Affiliation:
REQUIMTE, Faculty of Sciences and Technology (FCT), Nova University of Lisbon (UNL), Campus Monte de Caparica, 29289-516 Caparica, Portugal
Ineke Joosten
Affiliation:
Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands, Hobbemastraat 22, 1071 ZC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Irina Crina Anca Sandu*
Affiliation:
REQUIMTE, Faculty of Sciences and Technology (FCT), Nova University of Lisbon (UNL), Campus Monte de Caparica, 29289-516 Caparica, Portugal
*
**Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This work establishes a multiscale and multitechnique nondestructive approach as valid methodology for monitoring surface properties and evaluating the effectiveness of enzymatic removal of varnishes from paintings/polychrome artefacts.

Mock-up samples (documented reconstructions of oil, tempera, and gilded layers on canvas and wooden supports) were covered with different proteinaceous varnishes (egg white, animal and fish glue, casein) and then characterized before and after the removal of these coatings with enzyme-based solutions. The varnish was cleaned in several steps (two dry swabs and two wet swabs) with a clearance step for removing the residues from proteinaceous varnish or from enzyme solution.

Microscopy [stereomicroscopy (SM), optical microscopy (OM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)] and colorimetric (CIE L*a*b* system) techniques were used for characterization of the reconstruction surfaces at different scales (macro-scale by SM and OM; micro-scale by SEM and nano-scale by AFM). These techniques were also used to monitor the cleaning treatment.

Although results presented in this work were obtained for the specific treatment of enzyme removal, the methodology could be extended to other types of materials and cleaning. Further experiments on real works of art are needed for a complete validation of the methodology.

Keywords

multiscalenondestructive methodologypaint surfacecleaning effectivenessAFMproteinaceous varnish
Type
Materials Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 19 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 1632 - 1644
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aucouturier, M. & Darque-Ceretti, E. (2007). The surface of cultural heritage artefacts: Physico-chemical investigations for their knowledge and their conservation. Chem Soc Rev 36, 1605–1621.Google Scholar
Baglioni, M., Rengstl, D., Bonini, M., Giorgi, R. & Baglioni, P. (2010). Removal of acrylic coatings from works of art by means of nanofluids: Understanding the mechanism at the nanoscale. Nanoscale 2, 1723–1732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnstock, A. & White, R. (1990). The effects of selected solvents and soaps on a simulated canvas painting. Cleaning, Retouching and Coatings, Technology and Practice for Easel Paintings and Polychrome Sculpture, Preprints of Brussels Congress, ICC, London, September 3–7, pp. 111–123. London: John S. Mills et Perry Smith.Google Scholar
Calvo, A. (2002). Conservación y restauración de pintura sobre lienzo. Barcelona: Ediciones del Serbal.Google Scholar
Carlyle, L. (2001). The Artist's Assistant. Oil Painting Instruction Manuals and Handbooks in Britain 1800–1900 with Reference to Selected Eighteenth-Century Sources. London: Archetype Publications.Google Scholar
Cennini, C. (1984). Il libro dell'arte o trattato della pittura/di Cennino Cennini; a cura di Fernando Tempesti. Milan: Biblioteca Longanesi.Google Scholar
Cession, C. (1990). The surface layers of baroque gilding: Examination, conservation, restoration. In Cleaning, Retouching and Coatings: Contributions to the 1990 IIC Congress, pp. 33–35, Brussels.Google Scholar
Cremonesi, P. (2001). L'uso degli enzimi nella pulitura di opere policrome. Padova: Il Prato Editore.Google Scholar
Cremonesi, P. (2010). Rigid gels and enzyme cleaning. In New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings. Preprints of the International Conference, Fuster-López, L., Charola, A.E., Mecklenburg, M.F. & Domenéch-Carbo, M.T. (Eds.), p. 47. Valencia: Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Instituto de Restauracion del Patrimonio, Smithsonian Museum Conservation Institute.Google Scholar
de la Rie, E.R. (1982a). Fluorescence of paint and varnish layers (Part II). Stud Conser 27, 65–69.Google Scholar
de la Rie, E.R. (1982b). Fluorescence of paint and varnish layers (Part III). Stud Conser 27, 102–108.Google Scholar
de Sá, M.H., Ferreira, J.L., Melo, M.J. & Ramos, A.M. (2010). An AFM contribution to the understanding of surface effects caused by ageing and cleaning on acrylic glass. The Shadows by Lourdes Castro, a case study. Surf Interface Anal 43, 1165–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezrati, J. (2008). Two non-invasive techniques for the study of the surface of cultural heritage objects: Optical measurement of micro-roughness and backscattering spectro-colorimetry. In Proceedings of Art 2008—9th International Conference on NDT of Art, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
Fuster-López, L.A., Charola, E., Mecklenburg, M.F. & Domenéch-Carbo, M.T. (2010). New insights into the cleaning of paintings. Cleaning: Preprints of the International Conference. Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Instituto de Resta.Google Scholar
Gettens, R. & Stout, G. (1966). Painting Materials: A Short Encyclopaedia. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Gomori, G. (1955). Preparation of buffers for use in enzyme studies. Methods Enzymol 1, 138–146.Google Scholar
Hedley, G., Odlyha, M., Burnstock, A., Tillinghast, J. & Husband, C. (1990). A study of the mecanical and surface properties of oil paint films treated with organic solvents and water. Cleaning, Retouching and Coatings, Technology and Practice for Easel Paintings and Polychrome Sculpture, Preprints of Brussels Congress, ICC, London, September 3–7, pp. 98–106. London: John S. Mills et Perry Smith.Google Scholar
Khandekar, N. (2000). A survey on the conservation literature relating to the development of acqueous gel cleaning on painted and varnished surfaces. Rev Conser 1, 10–20.Google Scholar
Lorusso, S., Natali, A. & Matteucci, C. (2007). Colorimetry applied to the field of cultural heritage: Examples of study cases. Conserv Sci Cultur Herit 7, 187–220.Google Scholar
May, E. & Jones, M. (2006). Conservation Science. Heritage Materials. Cambridge, UK: RSC Publishing.Google Scholar
Mills, J.S. & Smith, P. (Eds) (1990). Cleaning, retouching and coatings. Technology and practice for easel paintings and polychrome sculpture. In Preprints of the Contributions to the Brussel Congress, 3–7 September 1990. London: International Institute for Conservation of of Historic and Artistic Works.Google Scholar
Odlyha, M., Theodorakopoulos, C., de Groot, J., Bozec, B. & Horton, M. (2009). Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (ATR/FTIR) and scanning probe microscopy of parchments. e-PS 6, 138–144.Google Scholar
Ormsby, B., Learner, T., Foster, G., Druzik, J. & Schilling, M. (2008). Wet-cleaning acrylic emulsion paint films: An evaluation of physical, chemical and optical changes. In Modern Paints Uncovered: Proceedings from the Modern Paints Uncovered Symposium, May 16–19, 2006, pp. 187–198. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.Google Scholar
Pelagotti, A., Pezzati, L., Bevilacqua, N., Vascotto, V., Reillon, V. & Daffara, C. (2005). A study of UV fluorescence emission of painting materials. In Proceedings of Art'05—8th International Conference on Non Destructive Investigations and Microanalysis for the Diagnostics and Conservation of the Cultural and Environmental Heritage, 15–19 May. Lecce, Italy: C. Parisi, G. Buzzanca and A. Paradisi, Rome electronic resource.Google Scholar
Pinna, D., Galeotti, M. & Mazzeo, R. (Eds.) (2009). Scientific Examination for the Investigation of Paintings. A Handbook for Conservator-Restorers. Firenze: Centro Di. ISBN: 978-88-7038-474-1.Google Scholar
Sandu, I.C.A., Afonso, L., Murta, E.F. & de Sa, M.H. (2010). Gilding techniques in religious art between east and west, 14th–18th Centuries. Int J Conserv Sci 1, 47–62.Google Scholar
Sandu, I.C.A, Busani, T. & de Sá, M.H. (2011a). The surface behaviour of gilding layers imitations on polychrome artefacts of cultural heritage. Surf Interface Anal Cultur Herit 8, 1171–1181.Google Scholar
Sandu, I.C.A, de Sa, M. & Pereira, M.C. (2011b). Ancient “gilded” art-objects from the European cultural heritage: A review on different scales of characterisation. Surf Interface Anal Cultur Herit 8(43), 1134–1151.Google Scholar
Schreiner, M., Melcher, M. & Uhlir, K. (2007). Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive analysis: Applications in the field of cultural heritage. Anal Bioanal Chem 387, 737–747.Google Scholar
Stulick, D., Miller, D., Khandekar, N., Wolbers, R., Carlson, J. & Peterson, W. (2004). Solvent Gels for the Cleaning of Works of Art. The Residue Question (Research in Conservation). In Valerie Dorje (Ed.), The Getty Conservation Institute. Los Angeles: Getty Pubications. ISBN 978-0-89236-759-7.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, K., Daudin, M., Joosten, I., Wei, W., Morrison, R. & Burnstock, A. (2008). A comparison of light microscopy techniques with scanning electron microscopy for imaging the surface cleaning of paintings. In Proceedings of Art 2008—9th International Conference on NDT of Art, Jerusalem, Israel.Google Scholar
Vickerman, J.C. & Gilmore, I.S. (Eds.) (2009). Surface Analysis. The Principal Techniques, 2nd ed.Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Westhoff, H. (1988). Coatings of medieval gilded surfaces and their deterioration. In Gilded Wood: Conservation and History: Postprints of the Gilding Conservation Symposium, 19, pp. 79–86. Madison, CT: Philadelphia Museum of Art.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J.R. (2003). Proteolytic enzymes. In Handbook of Food Enzymology, Whitaker, J.R., Voragen, A.G.J. & Wong, D.W.S. (Eds.), pp. 993–1018. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. Google Scholar