Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:45:47.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The New X-ray Mapping: X-ray Spectrum Imaging above 100 kHz Output Count Rate with the Silicon Drift Detector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2006

Dale E. Newbury
Dale E. Newbury
Affiliation:
Surface and Microanalysis Science Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8370, USA
Get access

Abstract

Electron-excited X-ray mapping is a key operational mode of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS). The popularity of X-ray mapping persists despite the significant time penalty due to the relatively low output count rates, typically less than 25 kHz, that can be processed with the conventional EDS. The silicon drift detector (SDD) uses the same measurement physics, but modifications to the detector structure permit operation at a factor of 5–10 times higher than conventional EDS for the same resolution. Output count rates as high as 500 kHz can be achieved with 217 eV energy resolution (at MnKα). Such extraordinarily high count rates make possible X-ray mapping through the method of X-ray spectrum imaging, in which a complete spectrum is captured at each pixel of the scan. Useful compositional data can be captured in less than 200 s with a pixel density of 160 × 120. Applications to alloy and rock microstructures, ultrapure materials with rare inclusions, and aggregate particles with complex chemistry illustrate new approaches to characterization made practical by high-speed X-ray mapping with the SDD.Note: The Siegbahn notation for characteristic X-rays is commonly used in the field of electron beam X-ray spectrometry and will be used in this article. The equivalent IUPAC notation is indicated in parentheses at the first use.In this article, the following arbitrary definitions will be used when referring to concentration (C) ranges: major: C > 0.1 (10 wt%), minor: 0.01 ≤ C ≤ 0.1 (1–10 wt%), and trace: C < 0.01 (1 wt%).

Keywords

electron beam microanalysisenergy dispersive X-ray spectrometrymicrostructural characterizationparticle analysisscanning electron microscopysilicon drift detector
Type
50 YEARS OF X-RAY MAPPING
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 26 - 35
Copyright
2006 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barkan, S., Saveliv, V., Iwanczyk, J., Feng, L., Tull, C., Patt, B., Newbury, D., Small, J., & Zaluzec, N. (2004). A new improved silicon multi-cathode detector (SMCD) for microanalysis and X-ray mapping applications. Microsc Today 12, 36–37.Google Scholar
Bright, D. (1995). MacLispix: A special purpose public domain image analysis program for the Macintosh. Microbeam Anal 4, 151–163.Google Scholar
Bright, D. (2003). Lispix: A new version of MacLispix for the PC is available at http://www.nist.gov/lispix. Source code is available on request.
Cosslett, V.E. & Duncumb, P. (1956). Micro-analysis by a flying spot X-ray method. Nature 177, 1172–1174.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, R., Keil, K., & Heinrich K. (1968). Solid-state energy-dispersion spectrometer for electron-microprobe X-ray analysis. Science 159, 528–530.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., Newbury, D., Joy, D., Lyman, C., Echlin, P., Lifshin, E., Sawyer, L., & Michael, J. (2003). Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis, 3rd ed. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
Gorlen, K., Barden, L., Del Priore, J., Fiori, C., Gibson, C., & Leapman, R. (1984). A computerized analytical electron microscope for elemental imaging. Rev Sci Instrum 55, 912.Google Scholar
Newbury, D. (2005). X-ray spectrometry and spectrum image mapping at output count rates above 100 kHz with a silicon drift detector on a scanning electron microscope. Scanning 27, 227–239.Google Scholar
Newbury, D. & Bright, D. (2005). “Derived Spectra”: Software tools for detecting spatial and spectral features in spectrum images. Scanning 27, 15–22.Google Scholar
Small, J. (1976). An elemental and morphological characterization of emissions from the Dickerson and Chalk Point coal-fired power plants. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Environmental Chemistry, University of Maryland.
Struder, L., Fiorini, C., Gatti, E., Hartmann, R., Holl, P., Krause, N., Lechner, P., Longoni, A., Lutz, G., Kemmer, J., Meidinger, N., Popp, M., Soltau, H., & van Zanthier, C. (1998). High resolution nondispersive X-ray spectroscopy with state of the art silicon detectors. Mikrochim Acta 15 (Suppl.) 11–19.Google Scholar