Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:08:29.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological Characteristics of the Developing Cecum of Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica)

Part of: Micrographia Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2019

Aalaa M. AbuAli ,
Doaa M. Mokhtar Open the ORCID record for Doaa M. Mokhtar [Opens in a new window] ,
Reda A. Ali ,
Ekbal T. Wassif  and
K. E. H. Abdalla
Aalaa M. AbuAli
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
Doaa M. Mokhtar*
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Vet. Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
Reda A. Ali
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
Ekbal T. Wassif
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
K. E. H. Abdalla
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Vet. Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
*
*Author for correspondence: Doaa M. Mokhtar, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The current investigation was carried out to record the final stages of the development of both middle and distal parts of quail ceca, Coturnix coturnix japonica to understand the role of ceca in digestion, immune system, and absorption. The cellular and subcellular structures, including epithelial cell height, microvillus surface area, the proportion of goblet cells, the thickness of muscle layer, and cecum diameter showed great variations during the development. An undeveloped smooth muscularis mucosa was observed for the first time on the ED5. Primordia of glands were observed on the ED7. On the ED15, the middle part exhibited two shapes of mucosal villi: tongue-shaped villi and U-shaped. The plicae and crypts of Lieberkühn were demonstrated on the hatching day. The lymphatic tissues appeared in the wall of both parts of the ceca at the 4 weeks of age. Scanning electron microscopy revealed a great difference in the mucosal surface between different regions. Telocytes were observed in-between the muscle fibers and formed a network during the post-hatching period. Because of fermentation and other bacterial or chemical processes that have been shown to occur in the ceca, this study supports two hypotheses: the cecal development is related to diet and the cecal epithelium act as a site for primary absorption of nutrients or for re-absorption of electrolytes or amino acids derived from the urine.

Keywords

Cecumhistogenesislymphocytestelocytes
Type
Micrographia
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 1017 - 1031
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abd El-Wahab, SM, Farrag, AH, El Deeb, RM & Eltatawy, SA (2017). Comparative histological and ultrastructural studies on the rectal caeca of three birds. Middle East J Appl Sci 7(2), 250–261.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, SJ, Stanley, RL & Evans, DJR (2010). Developmental stages of the Japanese quail. J Anat 216, 3–15.Google Scholar
Annison, EF, Hill, KJ & Kenworthy, R (1968). Volatile fatty acids in the digestive tract of the fowl. British J Nutr 22, 207–216.Google Scholar
Banks, WJ (1974). Histology and Comparative Organology—A Text and Atlas. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Company.Google Scholar
Bei, Y, Wang, F, Yang, C & Xiao, J (2015). Telocytes in regenerative medicine. J Cell Mol Med 19, 1441–1454.Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, AJ (1993). The spiral folds of the caecum in the ostrich. J Anat 183, 567–592.Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, AJ & Aswegen, G (1990). A light microscopic and immunocytochemical study of the gastrointestinal tract of the Ostrich (Struthio camelus). Onderstepoort J Vet Res 57, 37–48.Google Scholar
Carabino, R, Badiole, I, Chemosso, S, Garcia, J, Garcia-Reiz, AJ, Garcia-Rebollar, P, Gomes Conde, MS, Gutierrez, I, Nicodemus, N, Villamide, MJ & de Blas, JC (2008). Review: New trends in rabbit feeding, influence of nutrition on intestinal health. Span J Agric Res (special issue) 6, 15–25.Google Scholar
Ceafalan, L, Gherghiceanu, M, Popescu, LM & Simionescu, O (2012). Telocytes in human skin-are they involved in skin regeneration? J Cell Mol Med 16, 1405–1420.Google Scholar
Cheng, H (1974). Origin, differentiation and renewal of four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. V. Unitarian theory of the origin of the four epithelial cell types. Am J Anat 141, 537–561.Google Scholar
Chen Yieng How, H, Hoang Kao, H, Chung, J, Chen, YH, Hsu, HK & Hsu, JC (2002). Studies on the fine structure of caeca in domestic geese. Asian–Australasian J Anim Sci 15(7), 1018–1021.Google Scholar
Choct, M, Annison, G & Trimble, RP (1992). Soluble wheat pentosans exhibit different antinutritive activities in intact and cecectomized broiler chickens. J Nutr 122, 2457–2465.Google Scholar
Clarke, PL, Crompton, DWT, Arnold, S & Walters, DE (1980). Caecal growth in the domestic fowl following surgical manipulation. Poult Sci 21, 377–384.Google Scholar
Coates, ME, Ford, JE & Harrison, GF (1968). Intestinal synthesis of vitamins of the B complex in chicks. British J Nutr 22, 493–498.Google Scholar
Cretoiu, SM & Popescu, LM (2014). Telocytes revisited. Biomol Concepts 5(5), 353–369.Google Scholar
Duke, GE (1986). Alimentary canal: Anatomy, regulation of feeding, and motility. In Avian Physiology, Sturkie, ID (Ed.), pp. 269–288. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Fenna, L & Boag, DA (1974). Filling and emptying of the galliform caecum. Can J Zool 52, 537–540.Google Scholar
Firdous, AD & Lucy, KM (2012). Caecal development in kuttanad duck (Anas platyrhynchos domesticus). IOSR J Agric Vet Sci 1(2), 13–16.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, TC (1969). The Coturnix Quail, Anatomy and Histology, 1st ed. Iowa: The Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine, N, Meslin, JC, Lory, C & Andrieux, C (1996). Intestinal mucin distribution in the germ-free rat and in heterogenic rat harboring a human bacterial flora: Effect on inulin in the diet. Br J Nutr 75, 882–892.Google Scholar
Gandahi, JA, Chen, SF, Yang, P, Bian, XG & Chen, QS (2012). Ultrastructural identification of interstitial cells of cajal in hen oviduct. Poult Sci 91, 1410–1417.Google Scholar
Getty, R (1975). Sisson and Grossman's the anatomy of the domestic animals, vol. 2. Philadelphia: Saunders. pp. 1874–1875.Google Scholar
Gherghiceanu, M, Hinescu, ME, Andrei, F, Mandache, E, Macarie, CE, Faussone-Pellegrini, MS & Popescu, LM (2008). Interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) in myocardial sleeves of human pulmonary veins. J Cell Mol Med 12, 1777–1781.Google Scholar
Goldstein, DL (1989). Absorption by the cecum of wild birds: Is there interspecific variation. J Exp Zool 3(Suppl 3), 103–110.Google Scholar
Hamburger, V & Hamilton, HL (1992). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. Dev Dyn 195(4), 229–230.Google Scholar
Hamedi, S, Shomali, T & Akbarzadeh, A (2013). Prepubertal and pubertal caecal wall histology in Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Bulgarian J Vet Med 16(2), 96–101.Google Scholar
Harris, HF (1900). On the rapid conversion of haematoxylin into haematin in staining reactions. J App Microsc Lab Methods 3, 777, 1996, Cited by JD Bancroft and A Steven, Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 4th edition, Churchill Livingstone, New York.Google Scholar
Hershberg, RM & Mayer, LF (2000). Antigen processing and presentation by intestinal epithelial cells –polarity and complexity. Immunol Today 21, 123–128.Google Scholar
Hodges, RD (1974). The Histology of the Fowl. London: Academic press.Google Scholar
Huss, D, Poynter, G & Lansford, R (2008). Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) as a laboratory animal model. Lab Anim Lab Animal 37, 513–519.Google Scholar
Hussein, MM & Hassan, AHS (2018). Special histological features of the angioarchitecture of the ovaries in the Egyptian buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). J Adv Microsc Res 13, 1–8.Google Scholar
Hussein, MM & Mokhtar, DM (2018). The roles of telocytes in lung development and angiogenesis: An immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, scanning electron microscopy and morphometrical study. Dev Biol 443, 137–152.Google Scholar
Hutchings, G, Williams, O, Cretoiu, D & Ciontea, SM (2009). Myometrial interstitial cells and the coordination of myometrial contractility. J Cell Mol Med 13, 4268–4282.Google Scholar
Igwebuike, UM & Ezz, UU (2010). Morphology of the caeca of the African crow. Anim Res Inter 7(1), 1121–1124.Google Scholar
Jamroz, D, Jakobsen, K, Knudsen, KE, Wilczkiewicz, A & Orda, J (2002). Digestibility and energy value of the non-starch polysaccharides in young chickens, ducks and geese, fed diets containing high amounts of barley. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A, Mol Integr Physiol 131, 657–668.Google Scholar
Jeurissen, SH, Janse, EM, Koch, G & De Boer, GF (1989). Postnatal development of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues in chickens. Cell Tissue Res 258, 119–124.Google Scholar
Johnson, CF (1967). Disaccharides localization in hamster intestine brush borders. Science 31(155), 1670–1672.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, H, Zhao, XQ, Knudsen, KE & Eggum, BO (1996). The influence of dietary fiber source and level on the development of the gastrointestinal tract digestibility and energy metabolism in broiler chickens. Br J Nutr 75, 379–395.Google Scholar
Karnovsky, MJ (1965). A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. Cell Biol. 27, 137A.Google Scholar
King, AS & McLelland, J (1975). Lymphatic system. In Outlines of Avian Anatomy, King, AS & McLelland, J (Eds.), pp. 103–105. London: Bailliére Tindall.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, H, Hiratsuka, Y, Imagawa, T & Uehara, M (1998). Distribution of lymphoid tissue in the caecal mucosa of chickens. J Anat 192, 293–298, with five figures Printed in the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, H, Shiraishi, S, Imagawa, T & Uehara, M (2000). Ultrastructural characteristics and lectin-binding properties of M cells in the follicle associated epithelium of chicken caecal tonsils. J Anat 197, 607–616.Google Scholar
Klasing, KC (1998). Comparative Avian Nutrition. Wallingford and New York: CAB International.Google Scholar
Kumary, U, Venkatesan, S & Ramesh, G (2009). Microanatomical studies on the caecum of Japanese quail. Indian J Anim Sci 79(10), 1011–1014.Google Scholar
Mahdi, AH & McLelland, J (1988). The arrangement of the muscle at the ileo-caeco-rectal junction of the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos) and the presence of anatomical sphincters. J Anat 161, 133–142.Google Scholar
Majeed, MF, Al-Asadi, FS, Al Nassir, AN & Rahi, EH (2009). The morphological and histological study of the caecum in broiler chicken. Bas J Vet Res 8(1), 19–25.Google Scholar
McManus, JFA (1946). Histological demonstration of mucin after periodic acid. Nature 158(4006), 202.Google Scholar
McNab, JM (1973). The avian caeca: A review. World Poult Sci J 29, 251–263.Google Scholar
Mead, GC (1989). Microbes of the avian caecum: Types present and substrates utilized. J Exp Zool 3(Suppl 3), 48–54.Google Scholar
Mogilnaia, GM & BogatyrLia, M (1983). Histochemical characteristics of the epitheliocytes of the avian glandular stomach. Arch Anat Gistol Embriol 84, 62–70.Google Scholar
Mokhtar, DM (2017). Fish Histology: From Cells to Organs, 1st ed. Canada, USA: Apple Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mokhtar, DM & Abd-Elhafez, EA (2016). Morphological studies on the peripheral circulation of the ovary in one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). Anat Histol Embryol 45(4), 319–324.Google Scholar
Nasrin, M, Siddiqi, MNH, Masum, MA & Wares, MA (2012). Gross and histological studies of digestive tract of broilers during postnatal growth and development. J Bangladesh Agric Univ 10(1), 69–77.Google Scholar
Nickel, R, Schummer, A & Seiferle, E (1977). Anatomy of the Domestic Birds. Berlin Hamburg: Verlag Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Padgett, CS & Ivey, WD (1960). The normal embryology of the Coturnix quail. Anat Rec 137, 1–11.Google Scholar
Pandit, K, Dhote, BS, Mahanta, D, Sathapathy, S, Tamilselvan, S, Mrigesh, M & Mishra, S (2018). Gross and ultra-structural studies on the large intestine of Uttara fowl. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7(3), 1464–1476.Google Scholar
Patt, DI & Patt, GR (1969). Comparative Vertebrates Histology. London: Harpet and Row publishers.Google Scholar
Pilz, H (1937). Anmekmale am darmanal des hausgeflugels (Gans Ente, Hulm, Taube). Morphol Jahrb 70, 270–304.Google Scholar
Pulliainen, E & Tunkkari, P (1983). Seasonal variation in the gut length of willow grouse (Lagopus lagopus) in Finnish Lapland. Ann Zool Fenn 20, 53–56.Google Scholar
Rajathi, S (2017). Comparative morphology and morphometry of the caecum in pigeon and quail short title – caecum in pigeon and quail. Int J Sci Environ Technol 6(1), 885–888.Google Scholar
Reite, OB (2005). The rodlet cells of teleostean fish: Their potential role in host defense in relation to the mast cells/eosinophilic granule cells. Fish Shellfish Immunol 19, 253–267.Google Scholar
Robertson, AM & Wrihg, DP (1997). Bacterial glycosulfatases and sulfomucin degradation. Can J Gastroenterol 11, 361–366.Google Scholar
Son, JH, Karasawa, Y & Nahm, KH (2000). Effect of caecectomy on growth, moisture in excreta, gastrointestinal passage time and uric acid excretion in growing chicks. Br Poult Sci 41, 72–74.Google Scholar
Song, D, Cretoiu, D, Zheng, M, Qian, M, Zhang, M, Cretoiu, SM, Chen, L, Fang, H, Popescu, LM & Wang, X (2016). Comparison of chromosome 4 gene expression profile between lung telocytes and other local cell types. J Cell Mol Med 20, 71–80.Google Scholar
Strong, TR, Reimer, PR & Braun, EJ (1989). Avian cecal microanatomy: A morphometric comparison of two species. J Exp Zool 3(Suppl 3), 10–20.Google Scholar
Strong, TR, Reimer, PR & Braun, EJ (1990). Morphometry of the galliform cecum: A comparison between Gambel's quail and the domestic fowl. Cell Tissue Res 259, 511–518.Google Scholar
Svihus, B, Choct, M & Classen, H (2013). Function and nutritional roles of the avian caeca: A review. World's Poult Sci J 69, 249–263.Google Scholar
Takaki, M (2003). Gut pacemaker cells: The interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC). J Smooth Muscle Res 39, 137–161.Google Scholar
Thomas, DH (1982). Salt and water excretion by birds: The lower intestine as an integrator of renal and intestinal excretion. Comp Biochem Physiol 71A, 527–535.Google Scholar
Tortuero, F, Brenas, A & Riperez, J (1975). The influence of intestinal (ceca) flora on serum and egg yolk cholesterol levels in laying hens. Poult Sci 54, 1935–1938.Google Scholar
Ugalov, AM (1966). Hydrolysis of dipeptides in cells of small intestine. Nature (London) 212, 8594.Google Scholar
Uni, Z (2006). Early development of small intestinal function. In Avian gut Function in Health and Disease, Perry, GC (Ed.), 28, pp. 29–43. London, UK: Poultry Science Symposium Series.Google Scholar
Uni, Z, Smirnov, A & Sklan, D (2003). Pre- and post-hatch development of goblet cells in the broiler small intestine: Effect of delayed access to feed. Poult Sci 82, 320–327.Google Scholar
Vibek, D (2005). Ultrastructure difference between the two major component of chicken ceca. J Exp Zool 252(53), 21–31.Google Scholar
Yun, CH, Lillehoj, HS & Lillehoj, EP (2000). Intestinal immune responses to coccidiosis. Dev Comp Immunol 24, 303–324.Google Scholar
Zacchei, AM (1961). The embryonal development of the Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Arch Ital Anat Embryol 66, 36–62.Google Scholar
Zaher, M, El-Ghareeb, A, Hamdi, H & Abu Amod, F (2012). Anatomical, histological and histochemical adaptations of the avian alimentary canal to their food habits: I-Coturnix coturnix. Life Sci J 9(3), 253–275.Google Scholar
Zheng, Y, Cretoiu, D, Yan, G, Cretoiu, SM, Popescu, LM, Fang, H & Wang, X (2014). Protein profiling of human lung telocytes and microvascular endothelial cells using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics. J Cell Mol Med 18, 1035–1059.Google Scholar
Zheng, Y, Zhang, M, Qian, M, Wang, L, Cismasiu, VB, Bai, C, Popescu, LM & Wang, X (2013). Genetic comparison of mouse lung telocytes with mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts. J Cell Mol Med 17, 567–577.Google Scholar