Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:22:00.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructural Changes in Copper–Graphite–Alumina Nanocomposites Produced by Mechanical Alloying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2014

Ivan Rodrigues ,
Mafalda Guedes  and
Alberto C. Ferro
Ivan Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
Mafalda Guedes*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Technology, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal ICEMS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
Alberto C. Ferro
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal ICEMS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
*
*Corresponding authors. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Microstructural features of nanostructured copper-matrix composites produced via high-energy milling were studied. Copper–graphite–alumina batches were planetary ball milled up to 16 h; copper–graphite batches were also prepared under the same conditions to evaluate the effect of contamination from the milling media. The microstructure of the produced materials was characterized by field emission gun scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive spectroscopy and related to Raman, X-ray diffraction, and particle size analysis results. Results showed that alumina was present in all milled powders. However, size reduction was effective at shorter times in the copper–graphite–alumina system. In both cases the produced powders were nanostructured, containing graphite and alumina nanoparticles homogeneously distributed in the copper matrix, especially for longer milling times and in the presence of added alumina. Copper crystallite size was significantly affected above 4 h milling; nanographite size decreased and incipient amorphization occurred. A minimum size of 15 nm was obtained for the copper crystallite copper–alumina–graphite composite powders, corresponding to 16 h of milling. Contamination from the media became more significant above 8 h. Results suggest that efficient dispersion and bonding of graphite and alumina nanoparticles in the copper matrix is achieved, envisioning high conductivity, high strength, and thermal stability.

Keywords

coppergraphitealuminananostructured compositespowder processingmechanical alloying
Type
SPMicros Special Section
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 120 - 131
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braunovic, M., Myshkin, N. & Konchits, V. (2010). Electrical Contacts: Fundamentals, Applications and Technology. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Doelling, C.M., Vanderlicka, T.K., Song, J. & Srolovitz, D. (2007). Nanospot welding and contact evolution during cycling of a model microswitch. J Appl Phys 101, 124303/1–124303/7.Google Scholar
Esezobor, D. & Oladoye, A. (2011). Improvement on the tribological characteristics of particulate copper silicon carbide composites. In Proceedings of the EPD Congress 2011, Monteiro, S.N., Verhustl, D.E., Anyalebechi, P.N. & Pomykala, J.A. (Eds.), pp. 827–834. Warrendale: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society.Google Scholar
Everhart, J.L. (1979). Copper and copper alloy powder metallurgy properties and applications. In Source Book on Copper and Copper Alloys: A Comprehensive Collection of Outstanding Articles from the Periodical and Reference Literature , pp. 129–136. Metals Park, Ohio: ASM.Google Scholar
Fogagnolo, J.B., Velasco, F., Robert, M.H. & Torralba, J.M. (2003). Effect of mechanical alloying on the morphology, microstructure and properties of aluminium matrix composite powders. Mater Sci Eng A 342, 131–143.Google Scholar
Hussain, Z. & Kit, L.C. (2008). Properties and spot welding behaviour of copper–alumina composites through ball milling and mechanical alloying. Mater Design 29, 1311–1315.Google Scholar
Lee, D.W., Ha, G.H. & Kim, B.K. (2001). Synthesis of Cu-Al2O3 nanocomposite powder. Scripta Mater 44, 2137–2140.Google Scholar
López, G.A. & Mittemeijer, E.J. (2004). The solubility of C in solid Cu. Scripta Mater 51, 1–5.Google Scholar
Marques, M.T., Correia, J.B. & Conde, O. (2004). Carbon solubility in nanostructured copper. Scripta Mater 50, 963–967.Google Scholar
Merad, L., Cochez, V., Margueron, S., Jauchem, F. & Ferriol, M. (2009). In-situ monitoring of the curing of epoxy resins by Raman spectroscopy. Polym Test 28, 42–45.Google Scholar
Nickchi, T., Ghorbani, M., Alfantazi, A. & Farhat, Z. (2011). Fabrication of low friction bronze–graphite nano-composite coatings. Mater Design 32, 3548–3553.Google Scholar
Niwase, K., Tanaka, T., Kakimoto, Y., Ishihara, K.N. & Shingu, P.H. (1995). Raman spectra of graphite and diamond mechanically milled with agate or stainless steel mall-mill. Mater Trans 36, 282–288.Google Scholar
Nunes, D., Livramento, V., Correia, J.B., Hanada, K., Carvalho, P.A., Mateus, R., Shohoji, N., Fernandes, H., Silva, C., Alves, E. & Osawa, E. (2010). Consolidation of Cu-nD nanocomposites; hot extrusion vs spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Forum 636–637, 682–687.Google Scholar
Nunes, D., Livramento, V., Mateus, R., Correia, J.B., Alves, L.C., Vilarigues, M. & Carvalho, P.A. (2011). Mechanical synthesis of copper–carbon nanocomposites: Structural changes, strengthening and thermal stabilization. Mater Sci Eng A 528, 8610–8620.Google Scholar
Rajkovic, V., Bozic, D., Devecerski, A. & Jovanovic, M.T. (2012). Characteristic of copper matrix simultaneously reinforced with nano- and micro-sized Al2O3 particles. Mater Charact 67, 129–137.Google Scholar
Rajković, V., Božić, D. & Jovanović, M. (2007). Characteristics of copper and copper-Al2O3 composites prepared by high-energy milling. Metalurgija 46, 309–316.Google Scholar
Rajković, V., Erić, O. & Božić, D. (2004). Characterization of dispersion strengthened copper with 3wt% Al2O3 by mechanical alloying. Sci Sinter 36, 205–211.Google Scholar
Rajkumar, K. & Aravindan, S. (2013). Tribological behavior of microwave processed copper–nanographite composites. Tribol Int 57, 282–296.Google Scholar
Rietsch, J.-C., Gadiou, R.C., Vix-Guterl, C. & Dentzer, J. (2010). The influence of the composition of atmosphere on the mechanisms of degradation of graphite in planetary ball millers. J Alloys Compd 491, L15–L19.Google Scholar
Robles-Hernández, F.C. & Calderon, H.A. (2012). Nanostructured Al/Al4C3 composites reinforced with graphite or fullerene and manufactured by mechanical milling and spark plasma sintering. Mater Chem Phys 132, 815–822.Google Scholar
Shen, T.D., Ge, W.Q., Wang, K.Y., Quan, M.X., Wang, J.T., Wei, W.D. & Koch, C.C. (1996). Structural disorder and phase transformation in graphite produced by ball milling. Nanostruct Mater 7, 393–399.Google Scholar
Suryanarayana, C. (2001). Mechanical alloying and milling. Prog Mater Sci 46, 1–184.Google Scholar
Suryanarayana, C. & Al-Aqeeli, N. (2013). Mechanically alloyed nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci 58, 383–502.Google Scholar
Tao, Z., Guoa, Q., Gaoa, X. & Liua, L. (2011). The wettability and interface thermal resistance of copper/graphite system with an addition of chromium. Mater Chem Phys 128, 228–232.Google Scholar
Tjong, S.C. (2007). Novel nanoparticle-reinforced metal matrix composites with enhanced mechanical properties. Adv Eng Mater 9, 639–652.Google Scholar
Tuinstra, F. & Koenig, J.L. (1970). Raman spectrum of graphite. J Chem Phys 53, 1126–1129.Google Scholar
Waseda, Y., Matsubara, E. & Shinoda, K. (2011). X-Ray Diffraction Crystallography. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Welham, N. J., Berbenni, V. & Chapman, P. G. (2003). Effect of extended ball milling on graphite. J. Alloys Compd 349, 255–263.Google Scholar
Zawrah, M.F., Zayed, H., Essawy, R., Nassar, A.H. & Taha, M. (2013). Preparation by mechanical alloying, characterization and sintering of Cu–20wt.% Al2O3 nanocomposites. Mater Design 46, 485–490.Google Scholar
Zhan, Y. & Zhang, G. (2003). Graphite and SiC hybrid particles reinforced copper composite and its tribological characteristic. J Mater Sci Lett 22, 1087–1089.Google Scholar
Zhan, Y. & Zhang, G. (2004). Friction and wear behavior of copper matrix composites reinforced with SiC and graphite particles. Tribol Lett 17, 91–98.Google Scholar